Literature DB >> 1519323

A report of 104 transfusion errors in New York State.

J V Linden1, B Paul, K P Dressler.   

Abstract

In New York State, significant incidents involving the collection, processing, or transfusion of blood must be reported. Incident reports received over a 22-month period involving transfusion of blood to other than the intended recipient or release of blood of an incorrect group were analyzed. Among 1,784,600 transfusions of red cell components; there were 92 cases of erroneous transfusion that met study criteria (1/19,000). There were 54 ABO-incompatible transfusions (1/33,000); three of these (1/600,000) were fatal. Correction for underreporting of ABO-compatible errors resulted in an estimate of 1 per 12,000 as the true risk of transfusion error. National application of New York State data results in an estimate of 800 to 900 projected red cell-associated errors in the United States annually. The majority of reported errors occurred outside of the blood bank (43% resulted solely from failure to identify the patient and/or unit prior to transfusion and 11% resulted from phlebotomist error), while the blood bank was responsible for 25 percent of errors and contributed, with another hospital service, to 17 percent. The risk of transfusion of ABO-incompatible blood remains significant, and additional precautions to minimize the likelihood of such events should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1519323     DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1992.32792391030.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  25 in total

1.  Error management in blood establishments: results of eight years of experience (2003-2010) at the Croatian Institute of Transfusion Medicine.

Authors:  Tomislav Vuk; Marijan Barišić; Tihomir Očić; Ivanka Mihaljević; Dorotea Sarlija; Irena Jukić
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  [Quality assurance of haemotherapy in anaesthesia. Auswertung eines 3-jahrigen Erfahrungszeitraums].

Authors:  C von Heymann; A Pruss; A Foer; T Volk; J Braun; A Röhrs; H Kiesewetter; C Spies
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Twelve years of the Brazilian External Quality Assessment Program in Immunohematology: benefits of the program.

Authors:  Laércio Melo; Jordão Pellegrino; Celso Bianco; Lilian Castilho
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 4.  Systems for monitoring transfusion risk.

Authors:  Oswald Prinoth
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.443

5.  Lesson of the week: incompatible plasma transfusions and haemolysis in children.

Authors:  J K Duguid; J Minards; P H Bolton-Maggs
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-01-16

6.  Transfusion practices among patients who did and did not predonate autologous blood before elective cardiac surgery.

Authors:  J Y Dupuis; B Bart; G Bryson; J Robblee
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-04-06       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Patient safety with blood products administration using wireless and bar-code technology.

Authors:  Aleta Porcella; Kristy Walker
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

Review 8.  Blood bank audit.

Authors:  P H Pinkerton
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Errors in blood transfusion in Britain: survey of hospital haematology departments.

Authors:  D B McClelland; P Phillips
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-05-07

10.  The State and Trends of Barcode, RFID, Biometric and Pharmacy Automation Technologies in US Hospitals.

Authors:  Raymonde Charles Y Uy; Fabricio P Kury; Paul A Fontelo
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.