Literature DB >> 15192561

Intra-aneurysm sac pressure measurements after endovascular aneurysm repair: differences between shrinking, unchanged, and expanding aneurysms with and without endoleaks.

Nuno V Dias1, Krassi Ivancev, Martin Malina, Timothy Resch, Bengt Lindblad, Björn Sonesson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to study intra-aneurysm pressure after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in shrinking, unchanged, and expanding abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) with and without endoleaks.
METHODS: Direct intra-aneurysm sac pressure measurement (DISP) by percutaneous translumbar puncture of the AAA under fluoroscopic guidance was performed 46 times during the follow-up of 37 patients (30 men; median age, 73 years [range, 58-82 years]; AAA diameter: median, 60 mm [range, 48-84 mm]). Three patients were included in two different groups because DISP was performed more than once with different indications. Tip-pressure sensors mounted on 0.014-inch guidewires were used for simultaneous measurement of systemic and AAA sac pressures. Mean pressure index (MPI) was calculated as the percentage of mean intra-aneurysm pressure relative to the simultaneous mean intra-aortic pressure.
RESULTS: Median MPI was 19% in shrinking (11 patients), 30% in unchanged (10 patients), and 59% in expanding (9 patients) aneurysms without endoleaks. Pulse pressure was also higher in expanding (10 mm Hg) compared with shrinking (2 mm Hg; P <.0001) AAAs. Four of the nine patients with expanding AAAs underwent five repeated DISPs later in the follow-up, and MPIs were consistently elevated. Seven of the 10 patients with unchanged AAAs without endoleaks underwent further computed tomography follow-up after DISP; 2 expanded (MPI, 47%-63%), 4 shrank (MPI, 21%-30%), and 1 remained unchanged (MPI, 14%). Type II endoleaks (6 patients, 7 DISPs) were associated with wide range of MPI (22%-92%). Successful endoleak embolization (n = 4) resulted in pressure reduction.
CONCLUSIONS: Intra-aneurysm sac pressure measurement is an important adjunctive for EVAR evaluation, possibly allowing early detection of failures. High pressure is associated with AAA expansion and low pressure with shrinkage. Type II endoleaks can be responsible for AAA pressurization, and successful embolization appears to result in pressure reduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15192561     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.02.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  12 in total

1.  Endovascular stent graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Current status and future directions.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-31

2.  Analysis of anatomical risk factors for persistent type II endoleaks following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using CT angiography.

Authors:  Masayoshi Otsu; Toru Ishizaka; Michiko Watanabe; Takaki Hori; Hiroki Kohno; Keiichi Ishida; Mitsuru Nakaya; Goro Matsumiya
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Aneurysm sac expansion is independently associated with late mortality in patients treated with endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Sarah E Deery; Emel A Ergul; Marc L Schermerhorn; Jeffrey J Siracuse; Andres Schanzer; Philip P Goodney; Richard P Cambria; Virendra I Patel
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Unusual clinical course after surgical repair of unruptured aneurysm of sinus of Valsalva.

Authors:  Yoshimi Sato; Tatsuya Kawasaki; Michiyo Yamano; Sakiko Honda; Kuniyasu Harimoto; Shigeyuki Miki; Tadaaki Kamitani; Satoaki Matoba
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 1.314

5.  Type II endoleak with or without intervention after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair does not change aneurysm-related outcomes despite sac growth.

Authors:  Joy Walker; Lue-Yen Tucker; Philip Goodney; Leah Candell; Hong Hua; Steven Okuhn; Bradley Hill; Robert W Chang
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Perioperative factors associated with aneurysm sac size changes after endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Daijiro Hori; Yohei Nomura; Taketo Yamauchi; Hiroshi Furuhata; Harunobu Matsumoto; Naoyuki Kimura; Koichi Yuri; Atsushi Yamaguchi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm: Treatment options, image visualizations and follow-up procedures.

Authors:  Zhong-Hua Sun
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 8.  Diagnostic imaging methods applied in long-term surveillance after EVAR. Will computed tomography angiography be replaced by other methods?

Authors:  Karolina Stefaniak; Michal Stanisic; Marcin Gabriel; Grzegorz Oszkinis
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 1.426

9.  Detecting endoleaks after endovascular AAA repair with a minimally invasive, implantable, telemetric pressure sensor: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Fabian Springer; Roland Schlierf; Joachim-Georg Pfeffer; Andreas H Mahnken; Uwe Schnakenberg; Thomas Schmitz-Rode
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 7.034

10.  Correlation between intrasac pressure measurements of a pressure sensor and an angiographic catheter during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Pierre Galvagni Silveira; Christopher William Teixeira Miller; Rafael Freygang Mendes; Gilberto Nascimento Galego
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.