Literature DB >> 15191787

Current status and potential application of ISCOMs in veterinary medicine.

Bror Morein1, Ke-Fei Hu, Izzeldin Abusugra.   

Abstract

The immune stimulating complex (ISCOM) is a 40 nm nanoparticle used as a delivery system for vaccine antigens, targeting the immune system both after parenteral and mucosal administration. The ISCOM is made up of saponin, lipids and antigen usually held together by hydrophobic interaction between these three components. The compulsory elements to form the ISCOM structure are cholesterol and saponin. When the antigen is omitted the ISCOM-MATRIX is formed. There are a number of saponins that can form ISCOMs, and many other substances (including antigens, targeting and immuno-modulating molecules) can be incorporated into the ISCOM provided they are hydrophobic or rendered to be hydrophobic. Thus, it is possible to create ISCOM particles with different properties. After parenteral immunisation of the ISCOM, the T cell response is first detected in the draining lymph node. Subsequently, the T cell response is localised to the spleen, while the B cell response is first found both in the draining lymph nodes and in the spleen. Up to 50 days later, the majority of the antibody producing cells is found in the bone marrow (BM). In contrast, antigens that have been adjuvanted in an oil emulsion, limit the T cell response to the draining lymph nodes while the B cell response is found in the draining lymph nodes and spleen, but not in the BM. The ISCOM efficiently evokes CD8+, MHC class 1 restricted T cell response. The deposit of antigens both to the endosomal vesicles and to the cytosol of antigen presenting cells (APCs) explains why both T helper cells (vesicles) and cytotoxic T lymphocytes (cytosol) are efficiently induced by ISCOMs. The T helper (Th) cell response is balanced in the sense that both Th1 and Th2 cells are induced. Prominent IL-12 production by cells in the innate system is a characteristic reaction induced by ISCOMs, promoting the development of a strong Th1 response. After mucosal administration by the intranasal or the intestinal routes, the ISCOM induces strong specific mucosal IgA responses in local and remote mucosal surfaces. Also T cell responses are evoked by the mucosal administration. A large number of experimental ISCOM vaccines have been tested and protection has been induced against a number of pathogens in various species including chronic and persistent infections exemplified by human immune deficiency virus 1 (HIV-1), and 2 (HIV-2) and simian immune deficiency virus (SIV) in primates, and various herpes virus infections in several species. In contrast to a conventional rabies virus vaccine the ISCOM rabies formulation protected mice after exposure to the virulent virus. Recently, experimental ISCOM vaccines were shown to efficiently induce immune response in newborns of murine and bovine species in the presence of maternal antibodies, while conventional vaccines have failed. ISCOM vaccines are on the market for horses and cattle and several other ISCOM vaccines are under development. Since the ISCOM and the ISCOM-MATRIX can be blended with live attenuated vaccine antigens without hampering the proliferation of the live vaccine antigens, it opens the possibility to use the ISCOM adjuvant system in a mixture of live and killed vaccine antigens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15191787     DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2004.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev        ISSN: 0169-409X            Impact factor:   15.470


  18 in total

Review 1.  An introduction to nanotechnologies: what's in it for us?

Authors:  D Narducci
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Purification, stability, and immunogenicity analyses of five bluetongue virus proteins for use in development of a subunit vaccine that allows differentiation of infected from vaccinated animals.

Authors:  Jenna Anderson; Emmanuel Bréard; Karin Lövgren Bengtsson; Kjell-Olov Grönvik; Stéphan Zientara; Jean-Francois Valarcher; Sara Hägglund
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2014-01-22

Review 3.  Veterinary vaccine nanotechnology: pulmonary and nasal delivery in livestock animals.

Authors:  Daniella Calderon-Nieva; Kalhari Bandara Goonewardene; Susantha Gomis; Marianna Foldvari
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.617

4.  Novel catanionic surfactant vesicle vaccines protect against Francisella tularensis LVS and confer significant partial protection against F. tularensis Schu S4 strain.

Authors:  Katharina Richard; Barbara J Mann; Lenea Stocker; Eileen M Barry; Aiping Qin; Leah E Cole; Matthew T Hurley; Robert K Ernst; Suzanne M Michalek; Daniel C Stein; Philip Deshong; Stefanie N Vogel
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2013-12-18

Review 5.  Adjuvants: Engineering Protective Immune Responses in Human and Veterinary Vaccines.

Authors:  Bassel Akache; Felicity C Stark; Gerard Agbayani; Tyler M Renner; Michael J McCluskie
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 6.  Advances in the design and delivery of peptide subunit vaccines with a focus on toll-like receptor agonists.

Authors:  Matthew Black; Amanda Trent; Matthew Tirrell; Colleen Olive
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.217

7.  Effects of Wild Yam Root (Dioscorea villosa) Extract on the Gene Expression Profile of Triple-negative Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Elizabeth Mazzio; Abdulaziz Almalki; Selina F Darling-Reed; Karam F A Soliman
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.069

Review 8.  Is There an Optimal Formulation and Delivery Strategy for Subunit Vaccines?

Authors:  Sharan Bobbala; Sarah Hook
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 4.580

9.  Getting to grips with strangles: an effective multi-component recombinant vaccine for the protection of horses from Streptococcus equi infection.

Authors:  Bengt Guss; Margareta Flock; Lars Frykberg; Andrew S Waller; Carl Robinson; Ken C Smith; Jan-Ingmar Flock
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 6.823

10.  Mannosylated mucin-type immunoglobulin fusion proteins enhance antigen-specific antibody and T lymphocyte responses.

Authors:  Gustaf Ahlén; Lena Strindelius; Tomas Johansson; Anki Nilsson; Nathalie Chatzissavidou; Magnus Sjöblom; Ulrika Rova; Jan Holgersson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.