Literature DB >> 15191590

Five-year results following treatment of intrabony defects with enamel matrix proteins and guided tissue regeneration.

Anton Sculean1, Nicolaos Donos, Frank Schwarz, Jürgen Becker, Michel Brecx, Nicole B Arweiler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment with enamel matrix proteins (EMD) or guided tissue regeneration (GTR) has been shown to enhance periodontal regeneration. However, until now there are limited data on the long-term results following these treatment modalities. AIM: The aim of the present clinical study was to present the 5-year results following treatment of intrabony defects with EMD, GTR, combination of EMD and GTR, and open flap debridement (OFD).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-two patients, each of whom displayed one intrabony defect of a probing depth of at least 6 mm, were randomly treated with one of the four treatment modalities. The following parameters were evaluated prior to surgery, at 1 year and at 5 years after: plaque index, gingival index, bleeding on probing, probing pocket depth (PPD), gingival recession, and clinical attachment level (CAL). No statistically significant differences in any of the parameters were observed at baseline between the four groups.
RESULTS: The sites treated with EMD demonstrated a mean CAL gain of 3.4+/-1.1 mm (p<0.001) and of 2.9+/-1.6 mm (p<0.001) at 1 and 5 years, respectively. The sites treated with GTR showed a mean CAL gain of 3.2+/-0.8 (p<0.001) at 1 year and of 2.7+/-0.9 mm (p<0.001) at 5 years. The mean CAL gain at sites treated with EMD+GTR was 3.0+/-1.0 mm (p<0.001) and 2.6+/-0.7 mm (p<0.001) at 1 and 5 years, respectively. The sites treated with OFD demonstrated a mean CAL gain of 1.6+/-1.0 mm (p<0.001) at 1 year and 1.3+/-1.2 mm (p<0.001) at 5 years. At 1 year, the only statistically significant difference between the four different treatments was found in terms of PPD reduction and CAL gain between EMD and OFD (p<0.05). However, at 5 years there were no statistically significant differences in any of the investigated parameters between the four different treatments.
CONCLUSION: Within the limits of the present study, it may be concluded that the short-term clinical results following treatment with EMD, GTR, EMD+GTR, and OFD can be maintained over a period of 5 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15191590     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00518.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  15 in total

Review 1.  Long-term periodontal tissue outcome in regenerated infrabony and furcation defects: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eduardo Aleixo Figueira; Angélica Oliveira de Assis; Sheyla Christinne Lira Montenegro; Diego Moura Soares; Anna Angélica Araújo Barros; Euler Maciel Dantas; Bruno César de Vasconcelos Gurgel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  WITHDRAWN: Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects.

Authors:  Ian Needleman; Helen V Worthington; Elaine Giedrys-Leeper; Richard Tucker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-29

3.  Treatment of intrabony periodontal defects in controlled diabetic patients with an enamel matrix derivative: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Renata Cimões; Leógenes M Santiago; Arnaldo de França Caldas Júnior; Bruna de Carvalho Farias Vajgel; Jeniffer Perussolo; Nikolaos Donos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 4.  Enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain(R)) for periodontal tissue regeneration in intrabony defects.

Authors:  Marco Esposito; Maria Gabriella Grusovin; Nikolaos Papanikolaou; Paul Coulthard; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-10-07

5.  A 5-year prospective study on regenerative periodontal therapy of infrabony defects using minimally invasive surgery and a collagen-enriched bovine-derived xenograft.

Authors:  Thomas De Bruyckere; Aryan Eghbali; Faris Younes; Roberto Cleymaet; Wolfgang Jacquet; Hugo De Bruyn; Jan Cosyn
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Tissue engineering: A new vista in periodontal regeneration.

Authors:  Nymphea Pandit; Rajvir Malik; Deepa Philips
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2011-10

7.  Efficacy of Adjunctive Bioactive Materials in the Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shuai Zhou; Chengjia Sun; Shaohui Huang; Ximing Wu; Yan Zhao; Chunling Pan; Hongyan Wang; Junchao Liu; Qian Li; Yurong Kou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-27       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Regeneration of the Periodontal Apparatus in Aggressive Periodontitis Patients.

Authors:  Zvi Artzi; Shiran Sudri; Ori Platner; Avital Kozlovsky
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-08

9.  Early wound healing outcomes after regenerative periodontal surgery with enamel matrix derivatives or guided tissue regeneration: a systematic review.

Authors:  M A Rojas; L Marini; A Pilloni; P Sahrmann
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  Enamel matrix protein derivatives: role in periodontal regeneration.

Authors:  Vandana J Rathva
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2011-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.