UNLABELLED: We evaluated the histopathology of donor kidneys procured by laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN), by examining allograft biopsy specimens obtained immediately after donor nephrectomy (0-h biopsies). MATERIALS AND METHODS: LDN was performed on 65 donors between December 1999 and November 2002, in our institution. Their mean age was 56 years, and there were 19 males and 46 females. Hand-assisted LDN (HALDN) was used in 10 cases and retroperitoneal LDN (RPLDN) in 55 cases. Allograft biopsy of all 65 kidneys was performed immediately after LDN (0-h biopsy), and the biopsy specimens were used in this study. All specimens were routinely examined by light and immunofluorescence microscopy. The 43 donors who underwent traditional open donor nephrectomy (ODN) between January 2001 and June 2001 served as controls. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the rate of glomerular sclerosis and moderate interstitial fibrosis with tubular atrophy, the severity of arteriosclerosis, and the severity of arteriolar hyalinosis among the specimens from kidneys removed by the three different methods: HALDN, RPLDN, and ODN. Prominent and characteristic histopathological changes which are not usually seen in 0-h biopsy specimens of kidneys obtained by traditional ODN were 'subcapsular cortical damage (SCCD) with capsular lesions (CL)'. The SCCD with CL changes included a subcapsular degeneration and necrosis of tubular cells and a congestion of glomerular and peritubular capillaries (SCCD) associated with haemorrhage and fibrin deposits in the renal capsule (CL). In this study, such characteristic 'SCCD with CL' findings were observed in 35 specimens (54%). The damage was much milder in donor kidneys procured by RPLDN than by HALDN. CONCLUSION: SCCD with CL occurred in donor kidneys procured by LDN, which may be due to a compression of the renal parenchyma and veins. RPLDN may be better method for donor nephrectomy.
UNLABELLED: We evaluated the histopathology of donor kidneys procured by laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN), by examining allograft biopsy specimens obtained immediately after donor nephrectomy (0-h biopsies). MATERIALS AND METHODS:LDN was performed on 65 donors between December 1999 and November 2002, in our institution. Their mean age was 56 years, and there were 19 males and 46 females. Hand-assisted LDN (HALDN) was used in 10 cases and retroperitoneal LDN (RPLDN) in 55 cases. Allograft biopsy of all 65 kidneys was performed immediately after LDN (0-h biopsy), and the biopsy specimens were used in this study. All specimens were routinely examined by light and immunofluorescence microscopy. The 43 donors who underwent traditional open donor nephrectomy (ODN) between January 2001 and June 2001 served as controls. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the rate of glomerular sclerosis and moderate interstitial fibrosis with tubular atrophy, the severity of arteriosclerosis, and the severity of arteriolar hyalinosis among the specimens from kidneys removed by the three different methods: HALDN, RPLDN, and ODN. Prominent and characteristic histopathological changes which are not usually seen in 0-h biopsy specimens of kidneys obtained by traditional ODN were 'subcapsular cortical damage (SCCD) with capsular lesions (CL)'. The SCCD with CL changes included a subcapsular degeneration and necrosis of tubular cells and a congestion of glomerular and peritubular capillaries (SCCD) associated with haemorrhage and fibrin deposits in the renal capsule (CL). In this study, such characteristic 'SCCD with CL' findings were observed in 35 specimens (54%). The damage was much milder in donor kidneys procured by RPLDN than by HALDN. CONCLUSION:SCCD with CL occurred in donor kidneys procured by LDN, which may be due to a compression of the renal parenchyma and veins. RPLDN may be better method for donor nephrectomy.