Literature DB >> 15191288

Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated tangential beam irradiation for breast cancer.

J S Li1, G M Freedman, R Price, L Wang, P Anderson, L Chen, W Xiong, J Yang, A Pollack, C M Ma.   

Abstract

A Monte Carlo based intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning system has been developed and used for breast treatment. An iterative method was used for optimization to generate IMRT plans and a step-and-shoot technique was used for beam delivery. The patient setup and incident beam directions were the same as those for conventional tangential photon treatment. The weights for the opposed beamlets in the two tangential beams were determined first by the doses at the depths of the maximum dose at both sides to minimize hot spots. The intensity of an individual beamlet pair was then optimized based on the dose at the midplane. Fine tuning was made to achieve optimal target dose uniformity and to reduce the dose to the heart when necessary. The final dose calculations were performed using the Monte Carlo method and the plans were verified by phantom measurements. The dose distributions and dose-volume-histograms of IMRT plans were compared with those of conventional plans that were generated using a commercial treatment planning system and recalculated using an in-house Monte Carlo system for the first 25 patients. The dose comparisons showed that the percentage volume receiving more than 95% of the prescription dose (V95) and the percentage volume receiving more than 100% of the prescription dose (V100) for the clinical target volume (CTV) of IMRT plans were about the same as those of conventional plans. The percentage volume receiving more than 105% of the prescription dose (V105) for the CTV was reduced from 23.1% to 7.9% on average. The percentage volume of the lung receiving more than 20 Gy dose (V20 Gy) during the entire treatment was reduced by about 10%. The percentage volume of the heart receiving more than 30 Gy dose (V30 Gy) is reduced from 3.3% to 0.3%. Further studies revealed that a less than 5 degrees change in couch angle and collimator angle at patient setup had no significant effect on the dose coverage of CTV but had significant effect on the dose to the lung and heart. The study on the effect of beam spoiler showed that it increased the dose at the buildup region by 0- 13% that varies with location. The machine output linearity and stability for small monitor unit delivery of Siemens accelerators used for this study was checked and found to be suitable for breast IMRT. The total effect of variations was calculated to be less than 1% for typical breast treatments. The beam delivery time was increased by about 2 min compared with conventional tangential treatments. The whole treatment including patient setup and beam delivery can be completed in a 15 min slot. The IMRT technique has been proven practical for breast treatment clinically. The results showed that tangential IMRT improved the dose homogeneity in the breast and reduced the dose to the lung and heart.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15191288     DOI: 10.1118/1.1690195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  12 in total

Review 1.  Some computer graphical user interfaces in radiation therapy.

Authors:  James C L Chow
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-28

2.  Impact of the radiation boost on outcomes after breast-conserving surgery and radiation.

Authors:  Colin Murphy; Penny R Anderson; Tianyu Li; Richard J Bleicher; Elin R Sigurdson; Lori J Goldstein; Ramona Swaby; Crystal Denlinger; Holly Dushkin; Nicos Nicolaou; Gary M Freedman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Superficial dosimetry imaging of Čerenkov emission in electron beam radiotherapy of phantoms.

Authors:  Rongxiao Zhang; Colleen J Fox; Adam K Glaser; David J Gladstone; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Late complications of radiation therapy for breast cancer: evolution in techniques and risk over time.

Authors:  Zachary Brownlee; Rashi Garg; Matthew Listo; Peter Zavitsanos; David E Wazer; Kathryn E Huber
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-08

5.  Five-year local control in a phase II study of hypofractionated intensity modulated radiation therapy with an incorporated boost for early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Gary M Freedman; Penny R Anderson; Richard J Bleicher; Samuel Litwin; Tianyu Li; Ramona F Swaby; Chang-Ming Charlie Ma; Jinsheng Li; Elin R Sigurdson; Deborah Watkins-Bruner; Monica Morrow; Lori J Goldstein
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 6.  Radiation therapy planning with photons and protons for early and advanced breast cancer: an overview.

Authors:  Damien C Weber; Carmen Ares; Antony J Lomax; John M Kurtz
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 7.  Treatment techniques to reduce cardiac irradiation for breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy: a review.

Authors:  Robert E Beck; Leonard Kim; Ning J Yue; Bruce G Haffty; Atif J Khan; Sharad Goyal
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  A new method to deliver supraclavicular radiation in breast radiotherapy for lung sparing.

Authors:  Bo Yang; Zhang Dong; Mu-Han Lin; C-M Ma
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  SWIMRT: a graphical user interface using sliding window algorithm to construct a fluence map machine file.

Authors:  James C L Chow; Grigor N Grigorov; Nuri Yazdani
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Effect of collimator and couch angle change on breast IMRT dose distributions.

Authors:  Jie Yang; Charlie Ma; Lu Wang; Lili Chen; Jinsheng Li
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.