Literature DB >> 15191244

Evaluation of the Iowa Medicaid pharmaceutical case management program.

Elizabeth A Chrischilles1, Barry L Carter, Brian C Lund, Linda M Rubenstein, Shari S Chen-Hardee, Margaret D Voelker, Tae-Ryong Park, Angela K Kuehl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the effect of pharmaceutical case management (PCM) on medication safety and health care utilization.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort design with 9-month follow-up period (enrollment from October 1, 2000, through July 1, 2001, with follow-up through July 1, 2002).
SETTING: Iowa Medicaid program. PARTICIPANTS: 2,211 noninstitutionalized, continuously eligible Iowa Medicaid patients taking four or more chronic medications including at least one agent commonly used in at least 1 of 12 specific diseases who were cared for by pharmacists in 117 pharmacies.
INTERVENTIONS: Reimbursement for PCM services (initial patient assessment, written recommendations to physician, follow-up assessments and communication of progress and new problems to physician). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Use of high-risk medications, Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) score, health care utilization.
RESULTS: Pharmacists in 114 pharmacies had eligible patients during at least one quarter during the study period; 28 pharmacies were classified as high intensity based on the number of PCM patients they managed. A total of 524 of the eligible patients received 1,599 PCM services; 90% of claims were filed by pharmacists, and the remainder by physicians. Nearly one half (46.1%) of medications and 92.1% of patients had at least one medication problem before PCM. By closeout, the percentage of medications with problems decreased in 8 of 10 MAI domains for those who received PCM. Compared with baseline, mean MAI score improved significantly from 9.4 to 8.3 among PCM recipients (P < .001). Percentage of PCM recipients using high-risk medications decreased significantly compared with PCM eligibles who did not receive the service. In the 28 pharmacies that adopted the new service most intensely, patients had a significant decrease in high-risk medication use, compared with patients of low-intensity pharmacies (P < .001). No difference was observed between PCM recipients and PCM eligibles who did not receive PCM in health care utilization or charges, even after including reimbursements for PCM.
CONCLUSION: Medication safety problems were prevalent in this high-risk population. The PCM program improved medication safety during a 9-month follow-up period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15191244     DOI: 10.1331/154434504323063977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)        ISSN: 1086-5802


  18 in total

Review 1.  Polypharmacy in older adults with cancer.

Authors:  Ronald J Maggiore; Cary P Gross; Arti Hurria
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-04-24

2.  The Iowa Continuity of Care study: Background and methods.

Authors:  Barry L Carter; Karen B Farris; Paul W Abramowitz; David B Weetman; Peter J Kaboli; Jeffrey D Dawson; Paul A James; Alan J Christensen; John M Brooks
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 2.637

Review 3.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of pharmacist-led fee-for-services medication review.

Authors:  Ernieda Hatah; Rhiannon Braund; June Tordoff; Stephen B Duffull
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Polypharmacy as commonly defined is an indicator of limited value in the assessment of drug-related problems.

Authors:  Kirsten K Viktil; Hege S Blix; Tron A Moger; Aasmund Reikvam
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Evaluating Pennsylvania Pharmacists' Provision of Community-based Patient Care Services to Develop a Statewide Practice Network.

Authors:  Maria A Osborne; Margie E Snyder; Deanne L Hall; Kim C Coley; Melissa Somma McGivney
Journal:  Innov Pharm       Date:  2011-12-01

6.  Evaluation of prescriber responses to pharmacist recommendations communicated by fax in a medication therapy management program (MTMP).

Authors:  Prasadini N Perera; Mignonne C Guy; Ashley M Sweaney; Kevin P Boesen
Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm       Date:  2011-06

Review 7.  The effect of community pharmacy-based interventions on patient health outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Susan J Blalock; Andrew W Roberts; Julie C Lauffenburger; Trey Thompson; Shanna K O'Connor
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 3.929

8.  Description of pharmacist interventions during physician-pharmacist co-management of hypertension.

Authors:  Shannon J Von Muenster; Barry L Carter; Cynthia A Weber; Michael E Ernst; Jessica L Milchak; Jennifer J G Steffensmeier; Yinghui Xu
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2007-08-21

9.  HIV medication therapy management services in community pharmacies.

Authors:  Yardlee Kauffman; Vidya Nair; Keith Herist; Vasavi Thomas; Paul J Weidle
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2012

Review 10.  Medication therapy management services: definitions and outcomes.

Authors:  Annette N Pellegrino; Michelle T Martin; Jessica J Tilton; Daniel R Touchette
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.