Literature DB >> 1519109

Doctors as managers: poachers turned gamekeepers?

D J Hunter1.   

Abstract

Doctors in health care systems of different types are coming under increasing pressure to take on active roles in management. Mounting concern among governments over the escalating costs of health care, coupled with a desire to improve the quality of care and render services more responsive to user preferences has resulted in management being viewed as offering an effective means of tackling these issues. Until recently, the favoured strategy was to strengthen management in order to curb doctors' discretionary decision-making. There is now a shift towards creating managers out of doctors with all that this implies for the future shape of health services. There are also issues about the training and development required for a management role, the stratification of roles within the medical profession, and the future status of lay, or non-medical managers. The paper reviews the debate about doctors and managers and their distinctive value bases. It suggests that doctors can be involved in management as managers at two levels--meso and micro--and considers the issues raised at each level. The paper presents an analysis of the wider context in which the debate about doctors as managers is taking place. The main thesis put forward is that far from managers incorporating doctors, the end result may prove to be the other way round with 'provider capture' of the management agenda in health services a distinct possibility. In contrast to managers, doctors retain enormous public respect and support. As long as it is so doctors will remain powerful stakeholders in defining and controlling the shape and range of health services available. Their active involvement in management could lead to a strengthening of their position. It is argued that, paradoxically, this could make it more difficult for governments to challenge doctors' work practices. Medicine's traditional preoccupations and its resilience to change are likely to remain as strong as ever thereby disappointing advocates of a health and social care system located in a broader policy framework which emphasises health gain and a holistic approach to health.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1519109     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90349-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  4 in total

1.  Primary care groups and the right to prescribe.

Authors:  C Newdick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-11-14

2.  Clinicians in management: a qualitative study of managers' use of influence strategies in hospitals.

Authors:  Ivan Spehar; Jan C Frich; Lars Erik Kjekshus
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Medicine and management in European hospitals: a comparative overview.

Authors:  Ian Kirkpatrick; Ellen Kuhlmann; Kathy Hartley; Mike Dent; Federico Lega
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 4.  Medical leaders or masters?-A systematic review of medical leadership in hospital settings.

Authors:  Mathilde A Berghout; Isabelle N Fabbricotti; Martina Buljac-Samardžić; Carina G J M Hilders
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.