Literature DB >> 15191078

Validation of a head-neck computer model for whiplash simulation.

B D Stemper1, N Yoganandan, F A Pintar.   

Abstract

A head-neck computer model was comprehensively validated over a range of rear-impact velocities using experiments conducted by the same group of authors in the same laboratory. Validations were based on mean +/- 1 standard deviation response curves, i.e. corridors. Global head-neck angle, segmental angle and local facet joint regional kinematic responses from the model fell within experimental corridors. This was true for all impact velocities (1.3, 1.8 and 2.6 m s(-1)). The non-physiological S-curvature lasted approximately 100 ms. The present, comprehensively validated model can be used to conduct parametric studies and investigate the effects of factors such as active sequential and parallel muscle contractions, thoracic ramping and local tissue strain responses, as a function of cervical level, joint region and impact velocity in whiplash injury assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15191078     DOI: 10.1007/bf02344708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  16 in total

1.  Cervical electromyographic activity during low-speed rear impact.

Authors:  M L Magnusson; M H Pope; L Hasselquist; K M Bolte; M Ross; V K Goel; J S Lee; K Spratt; C R Clark; D G Wilder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Finite element modeling of the cervical spine: role of intervertebral disc under axial and eccentric loads.

Authors:  S Kumaresan; N Yoganandan; F A Pintar; D J Maiman
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 3.  Load-displacement properties of lower cervical spine motion segments.

Authors:  S P Moroney; A B Schultz; J A Miller; G B Andersson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Cervical muscle response during whiplash: evidence of a lengthening muscle contraction.

Authors:  J R Brault; G P Siegmund; J B Wheeler
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Response of a human head/neck/upper-torso replica to dynamic loading--II. Analytical/numerical model.

Authors:  Y C Deng; W Goldsmith
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Whiplash syndrome: kinematic factors influencing pain patterns.

Authors:  J F Cusick; F A Pintar; N Yoganandan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The response of human volunteers to rear-end impacts: the effect of head restraint properties.

Authors:  A F Tencer; S Mirza; K Bensel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Sagittal alignment of cervical flexion and extension: lateral radiographic analysis.

Authors:  Toshichika Takeshima; Shohei Omokawa; Takanori Takaoka; Masafumi Araki; Yurito Ueda; Yoshinori Takakura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Gender dependent cervical spine segmental kinematics during whiplash.

Authors:  Brian D Stemper; Narayan Yoganandan; Frank A Pintar
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Gender- and region-dependent local facet joint kinematics in rear impact: implications in whiplash injury.

Authors:  Brian D Stemper; Narayan Yoganandan; Frank A Pintar
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  6 in total

1.  Axial head rotation increases facet joint capsular ligament strains in automotive rear impact.

Authors:  Steven G Storvik; Brian D Stemper
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Effects of simulated injury on the anteroinferior glenohumeral capsule.

Authors:  Carrie A Rainis; Andrew J Brown; Patrick J McMahon; Richard E Debski
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Inter-individual variation in vertebral kinematics affects predictions of neck musculoskeletal models.

Authors:  Derek D Nevins; Liying Zheng; Anita N Vasavada
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  A three-dimensional finite element model of the cervical spine: an investigation of whiplash injury.

Authors:  Jian-Guo Zhang; Fang Wang; Rui Zhou; Qiang Xue
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Musculoskeletal modelling of the human cervical spine for the investigation of injury mechanisms during axial impacts.

Authors:  Pavlos Silvestros; Ezio Preatoni; Harinderjit S Gill; Sabina Gheduzzi; Bruno Agostinho Hernandez; Timothy P Holsgrove; Dario Cazzola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Application of Simulation Methods in Cervical Spine Dynamics.

Authors:  Meng-Si Sun; Xin-Yi Cai; Qing Liu; Cheng-Fei Du; Zhong-Jun Mo
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.682

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.