Literature DB >> 1519084

Do Australian researchers accept committee review and conduct ethical research?

P M McNeill1, C A Berglund, I W Webster.   

Abstract

We sought researchers' views on the ethics of research practice and the Australian system of review of research proposals by research ethics committees (RECs). Researchers were found to be supportive of review of research proposals, even though they thought that the process of review was time consuming and demanding. However, our findings suggest that not all researchers present their research proposals for review by committees, and that some researchers deviate from their approved proposals without seeking approval for those deviations from an REC. Researchers supported monitoring of research by RECs.

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach; National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia)

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1519084     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90028-o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  3 in total

1.  Monitoring clinical research: report of one hospital's experience.

Authors:  J McCusker; Z Kruszewski; B Lacey; B Schiff
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Monitoring clinical research: an obligation unfulfilled.

Authors:  C Weijer; S Shapiro; A Fuks; K C Glass; M Skrutkowska
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Knowledge about the research and ethics committee at Makerere University, Kampala.

Authors:  B R Ibingira; J Ochieng
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 0.927

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.