Literature DB >> 15189656

The effect of tube thoracostomy on oxygenation in ICU patients.

J J De Waele1, E Hoste, D Benoit, K Vandewoude, S Delaere, F Berrevoet, F Colardyn.   

Abstract

Previous research found that in noncritically ill patients, thoracocentesis has an unpredictable effect on oxygenation, possibly due to re-expansion pulmonary edema and systemic hypotension. The authors performed a retrospective analysis to study the effect of tube thoracostomy on oxygenation in ICU patients, and the complications associated with it. The authors reviewed the charts of 58 ICU patients in whom 74 procedures were performed. Demographic data, APACHE II score, and indication for thoracocentesis were retrieved from the patient's file. The P(a)O(2)/FiO(2) ratio was calculated before, 12, 24, and 48 hours after tube thoracostomy. P(a)O(2)/FiO(2) ratios at the mentioned time intervals were compared using 1-way analysis of variances (ANOVA) with repeated measures. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with a good response to treatment. Age of the patients was 53 +/- 19.0 years (range, 17-88), APACHE II score was 21 +/- 8.3 (range, 6-38), and median length of stay was 13.5 days (interquartile range, 7-25). The volume drained during the first 24 hours was 1077 +/- 667 ml. P(a)O(2)/FiO(2) ratio was 185 +/- 79.3 before chest drainage, 197 +/- 79.1 at 12 hours, 217 +/- 88.9 at 24 hours, and 233 +/- 99.8 at 48 hours. In only 54% of the procedures, a response to therapy was present. Multivariate analysis identified a P(a)O(2)/FiO(2) below 180 to be independently associated with improvement in oxygenation. At 24 and 48 hours, the P(a)O(2)/FiO(2) ratio was significantly higher than before drainage (P <.001). There were 13 complications in 11 procedures (14.9%). The authors' results suggest that tube thoracostomy can be used as an adjunct in the treatment of selected patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure in the ICU. A low P(a)O(2)/FiO(2) seems to be a good predictor of response to therapy. However, the complication rate is considerable, especially in patients with a prolonged ICU stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15189656     DOI: 10.1177/0885066602250358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0885-0666            Impact factor:   3.510


  5 in total

1.  Multiplane ultrasound approach to quantify pleural effusion at the bedside.

Authors:  Francis Remérand; Jean Dellamonica; Zhang Mao; Fabio Ferrari; Belaïd Bouhemad; Yang Jianxin; Charlotte Arbelot; Qin Lu; Carole Ichaï; Jean-Jacques Rouby
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Utility and safety of draining pleural effusions in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ewan C Goligher; Jerome A Leis; Robert A Fowler; Ruxandra Pinto; Neill K J Adhikari; Niall D Ferguson
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 9.097

3.  Risk Factors for Mortality Among Mechanically Ventilated Patients Requiring Pleural Drainage.

Authors:  Sojung Park; Won-Young Kim; Moon Seong Baek
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-02-16

4.  The effects of pleural fluid drainage on respiratory function in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Fraser J H Brims; Michael G Davies; Andy Elia; Mark J D Griffiths
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2015-08-28

5.  Indications and morbidity of tube thoracostomy performed for traumatic and non-traumatic free pleural effusions in a low-income setting.

Authors:  Alain Chichom Mefire; Marcus Fokou; Louis Din Dika
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2014-07-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.