Literature DB >> 15189483

Comparison of sensory gating to mismatch negativity and self-reported perceptual phenomena in healthy adults.

Michael A Kisley1, Tara L Noecker, Paul M Guinther.   

Abstract

To better understand the possible functional significance of electrophysiological sensory gating measures, response suppression of midlatency auditory event related potential (ERP) components was compared to the mismatch negativity (MMN) and to self-rated indices of stimulus filtering and passive attention-switching phenomena in an age-restricted sample of healthy adults. P1 sensory gating, measured during a paired-click paradigm, was correlated with MMN amplitude, measured during an acoustic oddball paradigm (intensity deviation). Also, individuals that exhibited less robust P1 suppression endorsed higher rates of "perceptual modulation" difficulties, whereas component N1 suppression was more closely related to "over-inclusion" of irrelevant sounds into the focus of attention. These findings suggest that the ERP components investigated are not redundant, but correspond to distinct-possibly related-pre-attentive processing systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15189483     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00191.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  35 in total

1.  Relationships between sensory "gating out" and sensory "gating in" of auditory evoked potentials in schizophrenia: a pilot study.

Authors:  Klevest Gjini; Cynthia Arfken; Nash N Boutros
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Phenomenological dimensions of sensory gating.

Authors:  William P Hetrick; Molly A Erickson; David A Smith
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Brain dynamics underlying training-induced improvement in suppressing inappropriate action.

Authors:  Aurelie L Manuel; Jeremy Grivel; Fosco Bernasconi; Micah M Murray; Lucas Spierer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The Role of Age, Gender, Education, and Intelligence in P50, N100, and P200 Auditory Sensory Gating.

Authors:  Marijn Lijffijt; F Gerard Moeller; Nash N Boutros; Scott Burroughs; Scott D Lane; Joel L Steinberg; Alan C Swann
Journal:  J Psychophysiol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.333

5.  Gamma and beta neural activity evoked during a sensory gating paradigm: effects of auditory, somatosensory and cross-modal stimulation.

Authors:  Michael A Kisley; Zoe M Cornwell
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  The auditory P50 component to onset and offset of sound.

Authors:  Hillel Pratt; Arnold Starr; Henry J Michalewski; Naomi Bleich; Nomi Mittelman
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Impairment in Mismatch Negativity but not Repetition Suppression in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Brian A Coffman; Sarah M Haigh; Tim K Murphy; Dean F Salisbury
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Maturation of sensory gating performance in children with and without sensory processing disorders.

Authors:  Patricia L Davies; Wen-Pin Chang; William J Gavin
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  P50, N100, and P200 sensory gating: relationships with behavioral inhibition, attention, and working memory.

Authors:  Marijn Lijffijt; Scott D Lane; Stacey L Meier; Nash N Boutros; Scott Burroughs; Joel L Steinberg; F Gerard Moeller; Alan C Swann
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Perspectives on sensory processing disorder: a call for translational research.

Authors:  Lucy J Miller; Darci M Nielsen; Sarah A Schoen; Barbara A Brett-Green
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.