BACKGROUND: In many countries including South Africa, the increasing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and tuberculosis (TB) epidemics have impacted significantly on already weakened public health services. This paper reviews the scope, process and performance of the HIV and TB services in a primary care setting where antiretroviral therapy is provided, in Khayelitsha, South Africa, in order to assess whether there is a need for some form of integration. METHODS: The scope and process of both services were assessed through observations of the service and individual and group interviews with key persons. The performance was assessed by examining the 2001-2002 reports from the health information system and clinical data. RESULTS: The TB service is programme oriented to the attainment of an 85% cure rate amongst smear-positive patients while the HIV service has a more holistic approach to the patient with HIV. The TB service is part of a well-established programme that is highly standardized. The HIV service is in the pilot phase. There is a heavy load at both services and there is large degree of cross-referral between the two services. There are lessons that can be learnt from each service. There is an overlap of activities, duplication of services and under-utilization of staff. There are missed opportunities for TB and HIV prevention, diagnosis and management. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that there may be benefits to integrating HIV and TB services. Constraints to this process are discussed.
BACKGROUND: In many countries including South Africa, the increasing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and tuberculosis (TB) epidemics have impacted significantly on already weakened public health services. This paper reviews the scope, process and performance of the HIV and TB services in a primary care setting where antiretroviral therapy is provided, in Khayelitsha, South Africa, in order to assess whether there is a need for some form of integration. METHODS: The scope and process of both services were assessed through observations of the service and individual and group interviews with key persons. The performance was assessed by examining the 2001-2002 reports from the health information system and clinical data. RESULTS: The TB service is programme oriented to the attainment of an 85% cure rate amongst smear-positive patients while the HIV service has a more holistic approach to the patient with HIV. The TB service is part of a well-established programme that is highly standardized. The HIV service is in the pilot phase. There is a heavy load at both services and there is large degree of cross-referral between the two services. There are lessons that can be learnt from each service. There is an overlap of activities, duplication of services and under-utilization of staff. There are missed opportunities for TB and HIV prevention, diagnosis and management. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that there may be benefits to integrating HIV and TB services. Constraints to this process are discussed.
Authors: Suzue Saito; Philani Mpofu; E Jane Carter; Lameck Diero; Kara K Wools-Kaloustian; Constantin T Yiannoutsos; Musick S Beverly; Simon Tsiouris; Geoffrey R Somi; John Ssali; Denis Nash; Batya Elul Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: L Page-Shipp; Y Voss De Lima; K Clouse; J de Vos; L Evarts; J Bassett; I Sanne; A Van Rie Journal: South Afr J HIV Med Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 2.744
Authors: Linda-Gail Bekker; George Alleyne; Stefan Baral; Javier Cepeda; Demetre Daskalakis; David Dowdy; Mark Dybul; Serge Eholie; Kene Esom; Geoff Garnett; Anna Grimsrud; James Hakim; Diane Havlir; Michael T Isbell; Leigh Johnson; Adeeba Kamarulzaman; Parastu Kasaie; Michel Kazatchkine; Nduku Kilonzo; Michael Klag; Marina Klein; Sharon R Lewin; Chewe Luo; Keletso Makofane; Natasha K Martin; Kenneth Mayer; Gregorio Millett; Ntobeko Ntusi; Loyce Pace; Carey Pike; Peter Piot; Anton Pozniak; Thomas C Quinn; Jurgen Rockstroh; Jirair Ratevosian; Owen Ryan; Serra Sippel; Bruno Spire; Agnes Soucat; Ann Starrs; Steffanie A Strathdee; Nicholas Thomson; Stefano Vella; Mauro Schechter; Peter Vickerman; Brian Weir; Chris Beyrer Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: James Pfeiffer; Pablo Montoya; Alberto J Baptista; Marina Karagianis; Marilia de Morais Pugas; Mark Micek; Wendy Johnson; Kenneth Sherr; Sarah Gimbel; Shelagh Baird; Barrot Lambdin; Stephen Gloyd Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2010-01-20 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: S Swindells; L Komarow; S Tripathy; K P Cain; R R MacGregor; J M Achkar; A Gupta; V G Veloso; A Asmelash; A E Omoz-Oarhe; S Gengiah; U Lalloo; R Allen; C Shiboski; J Andersen; S S Qasba; D K Katzenstein Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 2.373