Literature DB >> 15189321

The Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire: a pilot study.

A Pace-Balzan1, J I Cawood, R Howell, D Lowe, S N Rogers.   

Abstract

There are several validated health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires designed to record patient-derived outcomes in head and neck cancer. None deals specifically with oral rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to pilot a new questionnaire, the Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire (LORQ). The questionnaire consists of 25 items about oral function and denture satisfaction. A four-point Likert scale is used. Sixty-one consecutive patients attending oral rehabilitation clinics completed the LORQ in combination with the University of Washington Head and Neck questionnaire version 3 (UW-QOL) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer H and N quality of life questionnaire (EORTC H and N 35). Forty-two patients received questionnaires at baseline, whereas the rest were provided with the questionnaires at various stages of oral rehabilitation. For each item on the questionnaire, a full range of possible responses were given by patients. Kappa coefficients of agreement for test-retest data indicated moderate to very good agreement between repeat questionnaires. There were significant correlations (P < 0.001) between items in the LORQ and those in the UW-QOL and EORTC HN questionnaires. The LORQ also identified differences in responses between non-cancer and cancer groups of patients undergoing oral rehabilitation. This study of the LORQ is encouraging, although data on its responsiveness over time and to intervention is awaited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15189321     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01279.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  5 in total

1.  Impact of Oral Rehabilitation on Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: Study of 100 Patients with Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire and the Oral Health Impact Profile.

Authors:  Kanchan Dholam; Gunjan Chouksey; Jinesh Dugad
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-02-01

2.  Validation of the Turkish version of the Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire version 3 (LORQv3) in prosthetically rehabilitated patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Kadriye Peker; Meltem Ozdemir-Karatas; Ali Balık; Esma Kürklü; Omer Uysal; Simon N Rogers
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 3.  Using PROMs to guide patients and practitioners through the head and neck cancer journey.

Authors:  Simon N Rogers; Brittany Barber
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2017-11-08

Review 4.  Trismus following different treatment modalities for head and neck cancer: a systematic review of subjective measures.

Authors:  Sook Y Loh; Robert W J Mcleod; Hassan A Elhassan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Masticatory performance and oral health-related quality of life in edentulous maxillectomy patients: A cross-sectional study to compare implant-supported obturators and conventional obturators.

Authors:  Doke J M Buurman; Caroline M Speksnijder; Britt H B T Engelen; Peter Kessler
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 5.977

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.