Literature DB >> 15189218

'O father: where art thou?'--Paternity assessment in an open fission-fusion society of wild bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) in Shark Bay, Western Australia.

Michael Krützen1, Lynne M Barré, Richard C Connor, Janet Mann, William B Sherwin.   

Abstract

Sexually mature male bottlenose dolphins in Shark Bay cooperate by pursuing distinct alliance strategies to monopolize females in reproductive condition. We present the results of a comprehensive study in a wild cetacean population to test whether male alliance membership is a prerequisite for reproductive success. We compared two methods for inferring paternity: both calculate a likelihood ratio, called the paternity index, between two opposing hypotheses, but they differ in the way that significance is applied to the data. The first method, a Bayesian approach commonly used in human paternity testing, appeared to be overly conservative for our data set, but would be less susceptible to assumptions if a larger number of microsatellite loci had been used. Using the second approach, the computer program cervus 2.0, we successfully assigned 11 paternities to nine males, and 17 paternities to 14 out of 139 sexually mature males at 95% and 80% confidence levels, respectively. It appears that being a member of a bottlenose dolphin alliance is not a prerequisite for paternity: two paternities were obtained by juvenile males (one at the 95%, the other at the 80% confidence level), suggesting that young males without alliance partners pursue different mating tactics to adults. Likelihood analyses showed that these two juvenile males were significantly more likely to be the true father of the offspring than to be their half-sibling (P < 0.05). Using paternity data at an 80% confidence level, we could show that reproductive success was significantly skewed within at least some stable first-order alliances (P < 0.01). Interestingly, there is powerful evidence that one mating was incestuous, with one calf apparently fathered by its mother's father (P < 0.01). Our study suggests that the reproductive success of both allied males, and of nonallied juveniles, needs to be incorporated into an adaptive framework that seeks to explain alliance formation in male bottlenose dolphins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15189218     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02192.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  21 in total

1.  Cultural transmission of tool use in bottlenose dolphins.

Authors:  Michael Krützen; Janet Mann; Michael R Heithaus; Richard C Connor; Lars Bejder; William B Sherwin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Patterns of population structure for inshore bottlenose dolphins along the eastern United States.

Authors:  Vincent P Richards; Thomas W Greig; Patricia A Fair; Stephen D McCulloch; Christine Politz; Ada Natoli; Carlos A Driscoll; A Rus Hoelzel; Victor David; Gregory D Bossart; Jose V Lopez
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.645

3.  Cultural transmission of tool use by Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) provides access to a novel foraging niche.

Authors:  Michael Krützen; Sina Kreicker; Colin D MacLeod; Jennifer Learmonth; Anna M Kopps; Pamela Walsham; Simon J Allen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Affiliation history and age similarity predict alliance formation in adult male bottlenose dolphins.

Authors:  Livia Gerber; Richard C Connor; Stephanie L King; Simon J Allen; Samuel Wittwer; Manuela R Bizzozzero; Whitney R Friedman; Stephanie Kalberer; William B Sherwin; Sonja Wild; Erik P Willems; Michael Krützen
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.671

5.  Inbreeding tolerance and fitness costs in wild bottlenose dolphins.

Authors:  Céline H Frère; Michael Krützen; Anna M Kopps; Patrick Ward; Janet Mann; William B Sherwin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Cognitive enrichment device provides evidence for intersexual differences in collaborative actions in Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus).

Authors:  Eszter Matrai; Shaw Ting Kwok; Michael Boos; Ákos Pogány
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  FITNESS BENEFITS OF COALITIONARY AGGRESSION IN MALE CHIMPANZEES.

Authors:  Ian C Gilby; Lauren J N Brent; Emily E Wroblewski; Rebecca S Rudicell; Beatrice H Hahn; Jane Goodall; Anne E Pusey
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Larval dispersal connects fish populations in a network of marine protected areas.

Authors:  Serge Planes; Geoffrey P Jones; Simon R Thorrold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Early social networks predict survival in wild bottlenose dolphins.

Authors:  Margaret A Stanton; Janet Mann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A community split among dolphins: the effect of social relationships on the membership of new communities.

Authors:  Miki Nishita; Miki Shirakihara; Masao Amano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.