Literature DB >> 15188918

Telehospice in Michigan: use and patient acceptance.

Pamela Whitten1, Gary Doolittle, Michael Mackert.   

Abstract

Telehospice, the use of telemedicine technologies to provide services to hospice patients, offers an innovative solution to the challenges of providing high-quality, cost-effective end-of-life care. Specifically, the technology allows caregivers to transmit video images of patients, which provide off-site nurses with the information they need to assist the caregiver. Our telehospice project was conducted in urban and rural Michigan between 2000-2002 and collected data from 187 patients receiving telehospice services in their homes during this study. Overall, nurses were the primary providers of telehospice services and initiated the majority of routine televisits. Often, patients who described themselves as "overwhelmed" at the time of enrollment declined telehospice. However, patients were extremely satisfied with telehospice and often expressed frustration that nurses did not use the telehospice equipment more frequently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15188918     DOI: 10.1177/104990910402100307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care        ISSN: 1049-9091            Impact factor:   2.500


  14 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the evidence base for telehospice.

Authors:  Debra Parker Oliver; George Demiris; Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles; Karla Washington; Tami Day; Hannah Novak
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.536

2.  Support needs of informal hospice caregivers: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jean Kutner; Kristin M Kilbourn; Allison Costenaro; Courtney A Lee; Carolyn Nowels; Jenny L Vancura; Derek Anderson; Tarah Ellis Keech
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Comparing face-to-face and telehealth-mediated delivery of a psychoeducational intervention: a case comparison study in hospice.

Authors:  Debra Parker Oliver; George Demiris
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.536

4.  Why are patients with blood cancers more likely to die without hospice?

Authors:  Oreofe O Odejide; Angel M Cronin; Craig C Earle; James A Tulsky; Gregory A Abel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  An evolutionary examination of telemedicine: a health and computer-mediated communication perspective.

Authors:  Gerald-Mark Breen; Jonathan Matusitz
Journal:  Soc Work Public Health       Date:  2010-01

6.  Technologies to support end-of-life care.

Authors:  George Demiris; Debra Parker Oliver; Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.315

7.  The use of videophones for patient and family participation in hospice interdisciplinary team meetings: a promising approach.

Authors:  D Parker Oliver; G Demiris; E Wittenberg-Lyles; D Porock
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.520

8.  Development of a telehealth intervention for head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Barbara A Head; Jamie L Studts; Jeffrey M Bumpous; Jennifer L Gregg; Liz Wilson; Cynthia Keeney; Jennifer A Scharfenberger; Mark P Pfeifer
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.536

9.  Transmural palliative care by means of teleconsultation: a window of opportunities and new restrictions.

Authors:  Jelle van Gurp; Martine van Selm; Evert van Leeuwen; Jeroen Hasselaar
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Increasing Use of Ambulatory Video Visits for Pediatric Patients by Using Quality Improvement Methods.

Authors:  Jennifer L Rosenthal; Ilana S Sigal; Rory Kamerman-Kretzmer; Daphne S Say; Bianca Castellanos; Stephanie Nguyen; Natasha A Nakra; Bibiana Restrepo; Stephanie S Crossen
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2021-06-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.