Carolyn Guertin McHugh1, Lee W Riley. 1. Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the cost of hospitalization of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infection (BSI) versus patients with methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) BSI, controlling for severity of underlying illness; and to identify risk factors associated with MRSA BSI. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study based on medical chart review. SETTING: A 640-bed, tertiary-care hospital in Seattle, Washington. PATIENTS: All patients admitted to the hospital between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 1999, with S. aureus BSI confirmed by culture. RESULTS: Twenty patients with MRSA BSI were compared with 40 patients with MSSA BSI. Univariate analysis identified 5 risk factors associated with MRSA BSI. Recent hospital admission (P = .006) and assisted living (P = .004) remained significant in a multivariate model. Costs were significantly higher per patient-day of hospitalization for MRSA BSI than for MSSA BSI (dollar 5,878 vs dollar 2,073; P = .003). When patients were stratified according to severity of illness as measured by the case mix index, a difference of dollar 5,302 per patient-day was found between the two groups for all patients with a case mix index greater than 2 (P < .001). CONCLUSION: These observations suggest that MRSA BSI significantly increases hospitalization costs compared with MSSA BSI, even when controlling for the severity of the patient's underlying illness. As MRSA BSI was also found to be significantly associated with a group of patients who have repeated hospitalizations, such infections contribute substantially to the increasing cost of medical care.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the cost of hospitalization of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infection (BSI) versus patients with methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) BSI, controlling for severity of underlying illness; and to identify risk factors associated with MRSA BSI. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study based on medical chart review. SETTING: A 640-bed, tertiary-care hospital in Seattle, Washington. PATIENTS: All patients admitted to the hospital between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 1999, with S. aureus BSI confirmed by culture. RESULTS: Twenty patients with MRSA BSI were compared with 40 patients with MSSA BSI. Univariate analysis identified 5 risk factors associated with MRSA BSI. Recent hospital admission (P = .006) and assisted living (P = .004) remained significant in a multivariate model. Costs were significantly higher per patient-day of hospitalization for MRSA BSI than for MSSA BSI (dollar 5,878 vs dollar 2,073; P = .003). When patients were stratified according to severity of illness as measured by the case mix index, a difference of dollar 5,302 per patient-day was found between the two groups for all patients with a case mix index greater than 2 (P < .001). CONCLUSION: These observations suggest that MRSA BSI significantly increases hospitalization costs compared with MSSA BSI, even when controlling for the severity of the patient's underlying illness. As MRSA BSI was also found to be significantly associated with a group of patients who have repeated hospitalizations, such infections contribute substantially to the increasing cost of medical care.
Authors: Clinton C Haley; Deepa Mittal; Amanda Laviolette; Sai Jannapureddy; Najma Parvez; Robert W Haley Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2007-07-11 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Courtney A Gidengil; Charlene Gay; Susan S Huang; Richard Platt; Deborah Yokoe; Grace M Lee Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Daniel C Lee; Anchasa Kananurak; Michelle Tn Tran; Patricia A Connolly; Christopher R Polage; Tadayuki Iwase; Charles L Bevins; Mark A Underwood Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Eili Y Klein; Wendi Jiang; Nestor Mojica; Katie K Tseng; Ryan McNeill; Sara E Cosgrove; Trish M Perl Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 9.079