Literature DB >> 15187607

An error by any other name.

Ann Freeman Cook1, Helena Hoas, Katarina Guttmannova, Jane Clare Joyner.   

Abstract

Recent reports from the Institute of Medicine and other sources have shown that far too many avoidable medical errors occur; other research has shown a strong association between patient outcomes and characteristics of nursing staff. The authors of this paper present findings from multimethod research conducted over three years in 29 small rural hospitals in nine Western states. They examined the organizational processes used to recognize medical errors and assign responsibility for them to resolve patient-safety issues. The research comprises seven substudies that used surveys, questionnaires, interviews, and case studies to gather data from nurses, physicians, administrators, pharmacists, and other health care workers.Generally, participants responded positively to questions about an institution's receptivity to communicating about errors and agreed on the most common kinds of errors that occur. But other data suggest that providers' understanding of patient safety is heavily conditioned by preconceived notions of what constitutes an error and of professional roles. Participants' analyses of case studies showed that they don't agree on what constitutes error or what kinds of events should be reported. And in one substudy, even when there was overwhelming agreement among participants (97%) that an error had occurred, only 64% would disclose the error to the patient affected. Physicians, administrators, and nurses tended to perceive patient safety as primarily a nursing responsibility. Only 22% of respondents to one survey said that physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and administrators should share responsibility equally for patient safety. The research was not designed to answer specific questions about the recruitment and retention of nurses, but the data collected suggest that institutional processes used to identify errors, assign responsibility for them, and resolve patient-safety issues may have unintended, harmful effects on nurse recruitment and retention. The authors propose that "a systems approach to patient safety" be adopted, one in which responsibility for safety is shared by all members of the health care team.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15187607     DOI: 10.1097/00000446-200406000-00025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Nurs        ISSN: 0002-936X            Impact factor:   2.220


  6 in total

1.  Active surveillance using electronic triggers to detect adverse events in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  M K Szekendi; C Sullivan; A Bobb; J Feinglass; D Rooney; C Barnard; G A Noskin
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-06

2.  Perinatal safety: from concept to nursing practice.

Authors:  Audrey Lyndon; Holly Powell Kennedy
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.638

3.  What does quality care mean to nurses in rural hospitals?

Authors:  Marianne Baernholdt; Bonnie Mowinski Jennings; Elizabeth Merwin; Deirdre Thornlow
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  A cross sectional research on the height, weight and body mass index of children aged 5-6 years in Latvia and its secular changes during the last century.

Authors:  Helena Karkliņa; Dzanna Krumina; Inguna Ebela; Janis Valeinis; Gundega Knipse
Journal:  Cent Eur J Public Health       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.163

Review 5.  Medical errors and clinical risk management: state of the art.

Authors:  L La Pietra; L Calligaris; L Molendini; R Quattrin; S Brusaferro
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.124

Review 6.  What do family physicians consider an error? A comparison of definitions and physician perception.

Authors:  Nancy C Elder; Harini Pallerla; Saundra Regan
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 2.497

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.