Literature DB >> 15187573

Exploring the effects of ACE inhibitor tissue penetration on vascular inflammation following acute myocardial infarction.

James P Tsikouris1, Jose A Suarez, Jan S Simoni, Martin Ziska, Gary E Meyerrose.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Questions remain as to the existence of a class effect amongst angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and some literature suggests that pharmacological effects and outcomes may be determined by an ACE inhibitor's propensity to penetrate and inhibit the ACE enzyme at the vascular tissue level. Because vascular inflammation contributes to adverse outcomes following acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and angiotensin II influences inflammation at the vascular level, we hypothesized that high-tissue penetrating ACE inhibitors would provide more favorable effects on C-reactive protein (CRP) after AMI compared to low-tissue penetrating ACE inhibitors. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In a randomized open-label trial, patients received the high-tissue penetrating quinapril (n = 15) or low-tissue penetrating enalapril (n = 15) following AMI. C-reactive protein was measured at baseline and periodically over 14 days following drug initiation. All baseline characteristics and blood pressure response to treatment between groups were equivalent. Prior to initiating study medication, CRP concentrations (mg/g) were similar between enalapril and quinapril (0.327 +/- 0.571 versus 0.273 +/- 0.380, respectively, p = 0.77). The percent magnitude of change in CRP concentrations favored quinapril at all time points, starting 12 h after treatment initiation. When characterizing CRP production during treatments, the time courses were significantly different and demonstrated lower CRP concentrations with quinapril (p = 0.0107).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this investigation into the importance of ACE inhibitor tissue penetration on a common marker of vascular inflammation, suggests a potential vascular anti-inflammatory benefit with a more highly tissue penetrating ACE inhibitor following AMI. Further investigation into the true pharmacological similarities and differences amongst this class of drugs is warranted. Copyright 2004 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15187573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Coron Artery Dis        ISSN: 0954-6928            Impact factor:   1.439


  7 in total

Review 1.  Immunologic Effects of the Renin-Angiotensin System.

Authors:  Steven D Crowley; Nathan P Rudemiller
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 2.  Role of hypertension in the metabolic syndrome: who is affected?

Authors:  Gladys Velarde; Bradford C Berk
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and novel cardiovascular risk biomarkers: results from the Trial of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibition and Novel Cardiovascular Risk Factors (TRAIN) study.

Authors:  Matteo Cesari; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Hal H Atkinson; Brenda W Penninx; Mauro Di Bari; Russell P Tracy; Marco Pahor
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Amlodipine added to quinapril vs quinapril alone for the treatment of hypertension in diabetes: the Amlodipine in Diabetes (ANDI) trial.

Authors:  Sheldon Tobe; Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz; Faiez Zannad; George Vetrovec; Rajiv Patni; Harry Shi
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  hsCRP Level and the Risk of Death or Recurrent Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Myocardial Infarction: a Healthcare-Based Study.

Authors:  Juan Jesus Carrero; Mikael Andersson Franko; Achim Obergfell; Anders Gabrielsen; Tomas Jernberg
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 6.  The renin-angiotensin system modulates inflammatory processes in atherosclerosis: evidence from basic research and clinical studies.

Authors:  Fabrizio Montecucco; Aldo Pende; François Mach
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 4.711

7.  Effect of erythropoietin-stimulating agent on uremic inflammation.

Authors:  Yuri Tanaka; Nobuhiko Joki; Hiroki Hase; Masaki Iwasaki; Masato Ikeda; Ryoichi Ando; Toshio Shinoda; Daijo Inaguma; Toshifumi Sakaguchi; Yasuhiro Komatsu; Fumihiko Koiwa; Toshihiko Yamaka; Takashi Shigematsu
Journal:  J Inflamm (Lond)       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 4.981

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.