| Literature DB >> 15186675 |
Greg Clarke1, Robert T Hall, Greg Rosencrance.
Abstract
Currently, the common theoretical models of "preferred" decision-making relationships do not correspond well with clinical experience. This interview study of congestive heart failure (CHF) patients documents the variety of patient preferences for decision-making, and the necessity for attention to family involvement. In addition, these findings illustrate the confusion as to the designation of surrogate decision-makers and physicians in charge. We conclude that no single model of physician-patient decision-making should be preferred, and that physicians should first ask patients how they want medical information and decision-making to be handled.Entities:
Keywords: Analytical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship
Mesh:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15186675 DOI: 10.1162/152651604323097934
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Bioeth ISSN: 1526-5161 Impact factor: 11.229