Literature DB >> 15186629

Laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty and laparoscopic gastric bypass: a comparison.

Wei-Jei Lee1, Ming-Te Huang, Po-Jui Yu, Weu Wang, Tai-Chi Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) and gastric bypass (GBP) are the two bariatric procedures recommended by NIH consensus conference. Recent advancement in laparoscopic (L) techniques has made LVBG and LGBP alternatives for the conventional open approach.
METHODS: From December 2000 to February 2002, 80 patients (24 men and 56 women; mean age 32 years, range 18-57) with morbid obesity (mean BMI 43.2 kg/m(2), range 36-59.8) were enrolled in a prospective trial and randomly assigned to LVBG or LGBP. Changes in quality of life were assessed using the Gastro-intestinal quality of life index (GIQLI).
RESULTS: The conversion rate was zero for LVBG and 2.5% (1/40) for LGBP. There has been no mortality. Surgical time was significantly longer for LGBP (209 minvs 126 min for LVBG, P<0.001). Mean hospital stay was 3.5 days for the LVBG vs 5.7 days for LGBP (P<0.001). Postoperative analgesic usage was also less for LVBG patients (mean dose 1.4 vs 2.4, P<0.05). Early complication rate was higher in the LGBP group (17.8% vs 2.5%, P<0.001). All 3 major complications were in the LGBP group, of which 2 were related to anastomotic leakage (5%). Late complications consisted of upper GI bleeding, stenosis and others observed in 4 LGBP patients (10%) and 2 LVBG patients (5%). Mean follow-up was 20 months (range 18 to 30). BMI fell significantly in both groups, with significant improvement of obesity-related co-morbidities. LGBP had significantly better excess weight loss than LVBG (62.9% vs 55.4% at 1 year and 71.4% vs 53.1% at 2 years), as well as lower BMI than LVBG (29.6 vs 31.1 at 1 year and 28.5 vs 31.9 at 2 years). There was no difference in the reduction of obesity-related laboratory abnormalities at 1 year except a lower hemoglobin in LGBP (11.8 vs 13.8, P<0.05). Preoperative GIQLI scores were similar between the groups; however, at 1 year, LGBP patients had better GIOLI scores than LVBG patients (121 vs 106, P<0.01). LVBG had improvement in physical condition, social function and emotional conditioning but deterioration in GI symptoms which resulted in no increase in total GIQLI score.
CONCLUSION: LGBP was a time-consuming demanding technique with a higher early complication rate compared with LVBG. Although both operations resulted in significant weight reduction and decrease in obesity-related co-morbidities, LGBP had a trend of greater weight loss and significantly better GIQLI than LVBG at the cost of a significant long-term trace element deficiency state. Each patient should be individualized for the operations according to the patient's decision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15186629     DOI: 10.1381/096089204323093390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  25 in total

1.  Food tolerance and gastrointestinal quality of life following three bariatric procedures: adjustable gastric banding, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and sleeve gastrectomy.

Authors:  Shannon Elise Overs; Rebecca Anne Freeman; Nazy Zarshenas; Karen Louise Walton; John Oskar Jorgensen
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 2.  Surgical treatment of obesity.

Authors:  Nancy Puzziferri; Jeanne Blankenship; Bruce M Wolfe
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 3.  Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as revisional procedure after adjustable gastric band--a systematic review.

Authors:  Usha K Coblijn; Caroline J Verveld; Bart A van Wagensveld; Sjoerd M Lagarde
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  SAGES guideline for clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Randomized controlled trials in bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Chien-Pin Chan; Bing-Yen Wang; Ching-Yuan Cheng; Ching-Hsiung Lin; Ming-Chia Hsieh; Jun-Jiun Tsou; Wei-Jei Lee
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 6.  Analysis of health-related quality-of-life instruments measuring the impact of bariatric surgery: systematic review of the instruments used and their content validity.

Authors:  Raed Tayyem; Abdulmajid Ali; John Atkinson; Colin R Martin
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Revision of vertical banded gastroplasty complicated by a large para-esophageal hernia.

Authors:  Mansoor Khan; Fred Lee; Roger Ackroyd
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Effects of obesity surgery on type 2 diabetes mellitus Asian patients.

Authors:  Wei-Jei Lee; Keong Chong; Yi-Chih Lee; Kong-Han Ser; Shu-Chun Chen; Jung-Chien Chen; Wei-Pang Peng; Chih-Ming Chen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Quality of Life Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aleeya Hachem; Leah Brennan
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 10.  Challenges in the optimisation of post-operative pain management with opioids in obese patients: a literature review.

Authors:  C Lloret-Linares; A Lopes; X Declèves; A Serrie; S Mouly; J-F Bergmann; S Perrot
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.