Literature DB >> 15186079

Assisted reproduction: managing an unruly technology.

Mairi Levitt1.   

Abstract

Technology is "unruly" because it operates in a social context where it is shaped by institutions, organisations and individuals in ways not envisaged when it was first developed. In the UK assisted reproductive technology has developed from strictly circumscribed beginnings as a treatment for infertility within the NHS, to a service which is more often offered by commercial clinics and purchased by clients who are not necessarily infertile. The article considers the process by which assisted reproductive technology has been created and developed, a process which is ideological rather than technical, and the social implications of its ever expanding use. In a society where the discourse around reproduction and family life, is one of choice and acceptance of diversity of life styles, the conditions are set for further "uruliness" supported by clinicians and commercial interests. The HFEA, public consultations and media coverage tend to subscribe to the way ethical issues are framed by those interested parties, an approach that favours increased liberalisation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction; Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15186079     DOI: 10.1023/B:HCAN.0000026652.41927.2a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Anal        ISSN: 1065-3058


  8 in total

1.  Sex selection: choice and responsibility in human reproduction. Response of the British Fertility Society to the public consultation document.

Authors:  Jennifer Hunt; Masoud Afnan
Journal:  Hum Fertil (Camb)       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.767

2.  Reproductive tourism as moral pluralism in motion.

Authors:  G Pennings
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Can sex selection be ethically tolerated?

Authors:  B M Dickens
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Health risks in babies born after assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Alastair G Sutcliffe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-07-20

5.  Creating public alienation: expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs.

Authors:  B Wynne
Journal:  Sci Cult (Lond)       Date:  2001-12

6.  Is non-directive genetic counselling possible?

Authors:  A Clarke
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-10-19       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Nondirectiveness in genetic counseling: an empirical study.

Authors:  S Michie; F Bron; M Bobrow; T M Marteau
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  'Not so wrong that we are prepared to threaten the entire service': the regulation of reproductive technologies in the UK.

Authors:  M Levitt
Journal:  Hum Reprod Genet Ethics       Date:  2001
  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Overcritical, overfriendly? A dialogue between a sociologist and a philosopher on genetic technology and its applications.

Authors:  Mairi Levitt; Matti Häyry
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2005
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.