Literature DB >> 15186078

Like a frog in boiling water: the public, the HFEA and sex selection.

Søren Holm1.   

Abstract

This paper analyses the British Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority's 2002 public consultation on sex selection, a consultation that was mainly concerned with sex selection for non-medical reasons. Based on a close reading of the consultation document and questionnaire it is argued that the consultation is biased towards certain outcomes and can most plausibly be construed as an attempt not to investigate but to influence public opinion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction; Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15186078     DOI: 10.1023/B:HCAN.0000026651.97696.7b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Anal        ISSN: 1065-3058


  11 in total

1.  Sex selection and reproductive freedom.

Authors:  Alison Dundes Renteln
Journal:  Womens Stud Int Forum       Date:  1992 May-Jun

2.  Racism and sexism in medically assisted conception.

Authors:  Jonathan M Berkowitz; Jack W Snyder
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.898

3.  Sex selection: choice and responsibility in human reproduction. Response of the British Fertility Society to the public consultation document.

Authors:  Jennifer Hunt; Masoud Afnan
Journal:  Hum Fertil (Camb)       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.767

4.  Sex selection for gender variety by preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  John A Robertson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Sex selection in practice among Hong Kong Chinese.

Authors:  S F Wong; L C Ho
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 6.  Preference for a first-born boy in Western societies.

Authors:  Jacques D Marleau; Jean-François Saucier
Journal:  J Biosoc Sci       Date:  2002-01

7.  Sex preselection in New York City: who chooses which sex and why.

Authors:  M A Khatamee; A Leinberger-Sica; P Matos; A C Weseley
Journal:  Int J Fertil       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct

8.  Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: convention on human rights and biomedicine (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 19 November 1996). Council of Europe Convention of Biomedicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Firstborn preference and attitudes toward using sex selection technology.

Authors:  Doreen Swetkis; Faith D Gilroy; Roberta Steinbacher
Journal:  J Genet Psychol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.509

Review 10.  Sex selection: the systematic elimination of girls.

Authors:  Nandini Oomman; Bela R Ganatra
Journal:  Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2002-05
View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparing the burden: what can we learn by comparing regulatory frameworks in abortion and fertility services?

Authors:  Sebastian Sethe; Alison Murdoch
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2013-12

Review 2.  Sex selection: laissez faire or family balancing?

Authors:  Edgar Dahl
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2005-03

Review 3.  Regulating reprogenetics: strategic sacralisation and semantic massage.

Authors:  Robin Mackenzie
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-12

4.  The ethics of nonmedical sex selection.

Authors:  H Strange; R Chadwick
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2010-09

5.  A Feminist Critique of Justifications for Sex Selection.

Authors:  Tereza Hendl
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 1.352

6.  Engendering Harm: A Critique of Sex Selection For "Family Balancing".

Authors:  Arianne Shahvisi
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 1.352

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.