Literature DB >> 15185770

A randomized clinical trial with a 0.6% amino acid/ 1.4% glycerol peritoneal dialysis solution.

Wim Van Biesen1, Walter Boer, Bart De Greve, Clement Dequidt, Denise Vijt, Dirk Faict, Norbert Lameire.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glucose is an accepted osmotic agent for peritoneal dialysis (PD) although it has several drawbacks. Some of these drawbacks have been addressed by the introduction of solutions with low glucose degradation products and physiological pH in dual-chambered bags. Despite this achievement, there is a need for alternative osmotic agents.This randomized clinical trial analyzes 3-month's clinical experience with a mixture of 0.6% amino acids and 1.4% glycerol.
METHODS: The study was performed at the renal units of the University Hospitals Ghent, Belgium, and Utrecht, The Netherlands. Stable PD patients were randomized for either protocol A (test solution, n = 5) or protocol B (control regimen, n = 5). In both protocols, there was a run-in phase of 1 month with a dialysis regimen of 2 x 2 L 2.27% glucose solution (Dianeal; Baxter, Nivelles, Belgium), 1 x 2 L Extraneal (Baxter), and 1 x 2 L glucose solution (Dianeal). After this month-long run-in period, patients in group A received during 3 months 2 x 2 L amino acid/glycerol solution, 1 x 2 L Extraneal, and at least 1 x 2 L of a classic glucose solution.
RESULTS: Glucose absorption decreased in the test group during the test phase (from 84.2 +/- 8.7 to 11.7 +/- 11.6 g/24 hours, p = 0.001). Dialysate levels of cancer antigen 125 (CA125) increased in the test group, from 17.5 +/- 11.0 to 32.4 +/- 4.6 units/L (p = 0.04), whereas, in the control group, the levels remained stable (15.5 +/- 8.7 and 14.9 +/- 9.8 units/L respectively, p = 0.4). There were no differences in serum urea, serum bicarbonate, serum osmolarity, serum albumin, or parameters related to skin-fold thickness or serum glycerol levels between control and test solutions. No differences were observed in obtained ultrafiltration after a 4-hour dwell with 2.27% glucose or the test solution, both measured at week 4 of the run-in period and week 12 of the test period.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the use of a new 0.6% amino acid/1.4% glycerol-containing dialysis solution is safe and well tolerated. Glucose load was reduced significantly and dialysate CA125 levels improved significantly. Ultrafiltration was comparable with that of a 2.27% glucose solution. All these factors, in combination with the potential nutritional benefits, can contribute to a beneficial impact on the success of the PD technique. Further long-term studies in larger patient groups are warranted to explore the potential of this promising new solution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15185770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  7 in total

Review 1.  Aging of the Peritoneal Dialysis Membrane.

Authors:  Raymond T Krediet
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 2.  Pathogenesis and treatment of peritoneal membrane failure.

Authors:  Ramesh Saxena
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 3.714

3.  Simulating inadequate dialysis and its correction using an individualized patient-derived nomogram.

Authors:  Colin T White
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  Future technologies and techniques in peritoneal dialysis-opportunities and challenges ahead.

Authors:  Clifford J Holmes; Watske Smit
Journal:  NDT Plus       Date:  2008-10

5.  Monitoring of the peritoneal membrane.

Authors:  Dirk G Struijk
Journal:  NDT Plus       Date:  2008-10

6.  Acquired Decline in Ultrafiltration in Peritoneal Dialysis: The Role of Glucose.

Authors:  Raymond T Krediet
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 14.978

7.  Biocompatible dialysis fluids for peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Htay Htay; David W Johnson; Kathryn J Wiggins; Sunil V Badve; Jonathan C Craig; Giovanni Fm Strippoli; Yeoungjee Cho
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.