Literature DB >> 15185209

How low can you go? Effectiveness and safety of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in low-birth-weight neonates.

Andrew J Rozmiarek1, Faisal G Qureshi, Laura Cassidy, Henri R Ford, Barbara A Gaines, Peter Rycus, David J Hackam.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Controversy exists regarding the criteria for placement of infants on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) at low birth weights. The authors hypothesized that ECMO is effective and safe in babies under 2 kg and sought to examine outcome and survival rate in these infants.
METHODS: All patients less than 30 days old in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry (n = 14,305) were divided into those less than 2 kg (n = 663) and more than 2 kg (n = 13,642). Multiple regression analysis determined factors that predicted survival rate and the lowest safe weight for ECMO.
RESULTS: Overall survival rate was 76% and was lower in infants less than 2 kg (> or =2 kg, 77% v <2 kg, 53%, P <.0001). Survival rate was significantly lower for patients with diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) by regression. The incidence of ICH in babies less than 2.0 kg was 6% versus 4% in those more than 2.0 kg (P <.05). Regression analysis determined that the lowest weight at which a survival rate of 40% could be achieved was 1.6 kg.
CONCLUSIONS: Cannulation for ECMO may be safe and effective in babies under 2.0 kg and potentially as low as 1.6 kg. Judicious anticoagulation might limit bleeding, which occurred in a minority of these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15185209     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  6 in total

1.  Cannulating the contraindicated: effect of low birth weight on mortality in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Patrick T Delaplain; Lishi Zhang; Yanjun Chen; Danh V Nguyen; Matteo Di Nardo; John Patrick Cleary; Peter T Yu; Yigit S Guner
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 2.545

2.  Neurologic complications in neonates supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. An analysis of ELSO registry data.

Authors:  Angelo Polito; Cindy S Barrett; David Wypij; Peter T Rycus; Roberta Netto; Paola E Cogo; Ravi R Thiagarajan
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Development and Validation of the Neonatal Risk Estimate Score for Children Using Extracorporeal Respiratory Support.

Authors:  Ryan P Barbaro; Robert H Bartlett; Rachel L Chapman; Matthew L Paden; Lloyd A Roberts; Achamyeleh Gebremariam; Gail M Annich; Matthew M Davis
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Patient selection for neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: beyond severity of illness.

Authors:  R L Chapman; S M Peterec; M J Bizzarro; M R Mercurio
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 5.  Hematologic concerns in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Jonathan Sniderman; Paul Monagle; Gail M Annich; Graeme MacLaren
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-05-15

Review 6.  Pediatric and neonatal extracorporeal life support: current state and continuing evolution.

Authors:  Brian P Fallon; Samir K Gadepalli; Ronald B Hirschl
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 1.827

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.