OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation of blood pressure (BP) to subsequent decline in cognitive function among persons age 65 or over. METHODS: All persons age 65 or over in a geographically defined community were invited to participate in a longitudinal study of problems of the elderly. Interviews were conducted in the participants' homes and included two BP measures and four tests of cognitive function. Follow-up interviews 3 and 6 years after baseline repeated the cognitive function tests. These analyses included 4,284 individuals who had baseline and at least one follow-up measure of cognitive function. The average of z scores of the individual cognitive function tests was used as a global measure of cognitive function. RESULTS: In random effects analyses controlling for age, sex, education, and race, there was no significant linear association of either systolic or diastolic BP with 6-year change in global cognitive function score. There was no significant curvilinear association with systolic BP. In tests for a curvilinear association with diastolic BP, there was a suggestion of increased decline among those with low or high diastolic BP (p = 0.03 for the quadratic diastolic term). At baseline, 50% of participants took some type of medication affecting BP. CONCLUSION: In this community population where BP treatment was common, there was no association of either high systolic or high diastolic BP at the beginning of the observation interval with 6-year cognitive decline.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation of blood pressure (BP) to subsequent decline in cognitive function among persons age 65 or over. METHODS: All persons age 65 or over in a geographically defined community were invited to participate in a longitudinal study of problems of the elderly. Interviews were conducted in the participants' homes and included two BP measures and four tests of cognitive function. Follow-up interviews 3 and 6 years after baseline repeated the cognitive function tests. These analyses included 4,284 individuals who had baseline and at least one follow-up measure of cognitive function. The average of z scores of the individual cognitive function tests was used as a global measure of cognitive function. RESULTS: In random effects analyses controlling for age, sex, education, and race, there was no significant linear association of either systolic or diastolic BP with 6-year change in global cognitive function score. There was no significant curvilinear association with systolic BP. In tests for a curvilinear association with diastolic BP, there was a suggestion of increased decline among those with low or high diastolic BP (p = 0.03 for the quadratic diastolic term). At baseline, 50% of participants took some type of medication affecting BP. CONCLUSION: In this community population where BP treatment was common, there was no association of either high systolic or high diastolic BP at the beginning of the observation interval with 6-year cognitive decline.
Authors: Andrea M Piccinin; Graciela Muniz; Catharine Sparks; Daniel E Bontempo Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: L Su; Y Jin; F W Unverzagt; C Liang; Y Cheng; A M Hake; D Kuruppu; F Ma; J Liu; C Chen; J Bian; P Li; S Gao Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2016 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Ai Koyanagi; Elvira Lara; Brendon Stubbs; Andre F Carvalho; Hans Oh; Andrew Stickley; Nicola Veronese; Davy Vancampfort Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-02-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Costantino Iadecola; Kristine Yaffe; José Biller; Lisa C Bratzke; Frank M Faraci; Philip B Gorelick; Martha Gulati; Hooman Kamel; David S Knopman; Lenore J Launer; Jane S Saczynski; Sudha Seshadri; Adina Zeki Al Hazzouri Journal: Hypertension Date: 2016-10-10 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: S D Israeli-Korn; M Masarwa; E Schechtman; A Abuful; R Strugatsky; S Avni; L A Farrer; R P Friedland; R Inzelberg Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2009-12-11 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: G Tsivgoulis; A V Alexandrov; V G Wadley; F W Unverzagt; R C P Go; C S Moy; B Kissela; G Howard Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-08-25 Impact factor: 9.910