Literature DB >> 15184227

Meta-analysis based on standardized effects is unreliable.

Peter Cummings.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2004        PMID： 15184227     DOI： 10.1001/archpedi.158.6.595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med        ISSN： 1072-4710


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  The importance of measuring internalized homophobia/homonegativity.

Authors:  Michael W Ross; B R Simon Rosser; Derek Smolenski
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2010-12

2.  Combining extant datasets with differing outcome measures across studies of older adults after cancer surgery.

Authors:  Janet H Van Cleave; Brian L Egleston; Meg Bourbonniere; Ruth McCorkle
Journal:  Res Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 1.571

Review 3.  The relative effectiveness of segment specific level and non-specific level spinal joint mobilization on pain and range of motion: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emily Joan Slaven; Adam P Goode; Rogelio A Coronado; Charles Poole; Eric J Hegedus
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2013-02

Review 4.  Combining scores from different patient reported outcome measures in meta-analyses: when is it justified?

Authors:  Milo A Puhan; Irene Soesilo; Gordon H Guyatt; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  Production responses of Holstein dairy cows when fed supplemental fat containing saturated free fatty acids: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wenping Hu; Jacquelyn P Boerman; James M Aldrich
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.509

6.  Scalp block for analgesia after craniotomy: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ardyan Wardhana; Sudadi Sudadi
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2019-11-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.