Literature DB >> 15183976

Robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a single assistant.

David I Lee1, Louis Eichel, Douglas W Skarecky, Thomas E Ahlering.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: As experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (rLRP) grows, the importance of the role of the assistant cannot be overstated. Key elements of the operation, dependent on the assistant, have not been reported. The focus of this report was to describe the key elements, which include positioning of the patient and assistant port sites, appropriate equipment, and the assistant-dependent steps of the procedure. TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS: During the course of the initial 100 cases, we reviewed the patient and port site positioning and reviewed the videotapes to identify key elements of the assistant's role that facilitate rLRP. We identified three important elements pertaining to patient positioning. In contrast to standard port site recommendations, we found that dominant and nondominant handedness dictate the assistant port site locations. Finally, we identified specific steps of the procedure that require the assistant to have laparoscopic skills necessary for the console surgeon to dissect the bladder neck, seminal vesicles, rectum, and neurovascular bundles.
CONCLUSIONS: The assistant in rLRP is critical to the success of rLRP, especially in the learning phases. Right or left-handed dominance determines on which side the assistant should be positioned. In contrast to the console surgeon, the assistant should have intermediate to advanced laparoscopic skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15183976     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.01.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  13 in total

1.  Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a single laparoscopic trained surgeon's experience in the development of a robotic partial nephrectomy program.

Authors:  Stephen B Williams; Ravi Kacker; Mehrdad Alemozaffar; Ignacio San Francisco; Jodi Mechaber; Andrew A Wagner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  The decisive role of the patient-side surgeon in robotic surgery.

Authors:  Olivia Sgarbura; Catalin Vasilescu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Francois Rozet; Justin Harmon; Xavier Cathelineau; Eric Barret; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Single-centre study comparing standard apical dissection with a modified technique to facilitate vesico-urethral anastomosis during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Xin Gao; Xiao-Yong Pu; Jie Si-Tu; Wen-Tao Huang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  The role of the assistant during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: does experience matter?

Authors:  Aaron M Potretzke; Brent A Knight; John A Brockman; Joel Vetter; Robert S Figenshau; Sam B Bhayani; Brian M Benway
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-04-02

Review 6.  Robotic prostatectomy - a review.

Authors:  Assaad El-Hakim; Ashutosh Tewari
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-10-25

7.  The 'scrubbed surgeon' in robotic surgery.

Authors:  Rajeev Kumar; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Prospective analysis of completely stentless robot-assisted pyeloplasty in children.

Authors:  Pasquale Casale; Sarah Lambert
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-11-21

9.  Robotic surgery: India is not ready yet.

Authors:  Girish G Nelivigi
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-07

10.  Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy after the first decade: surgical evolution or new paradigm.

Authors:  Douglas W Skarecky
Journal:  ISRN Urol       Date:  2013-04-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.