Literature DB >> 15183687

Dexamethasone, BMP-2, and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D enhance a more differentiated osteoblast phenotype: validation of an in vitro model for human bone marrow-derived primary osteoblasts.

N R Jørgensen1, Z Henriksen, O H Sørensen, R Civitelli.   

Abstract

In vitro models of bone cells are important for the study of bone biology, including the regulation of bone formation and resorption. In this study, we have validated an in vitro model of human osteoblastic cells obtained from bone marrow biopsies from healthy, young volunteers, aged 20-31 years. Osteoblast phenotypes were induced by either dexamethasone (Dex) or bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2). Bone marrow was obtained from biopsies at the posterior iliac spine. Cells were isolated by gradient centrifugation and grown to confluence. Cells were treated with 1 nM 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (vitamin D), 100 nM Dex, and/or 100 ng/ml BMP-2. The osteoblast phenotype was assessed as alkaline phosphatase (AP) activity/staining, production of osteocalcin and procollagen type 1 (P1NP), parathyroid hormone (PTH)-induced cyclic adenosine mono-phosphate (cAMP) production, and in vitro mineralization. AP activity was increased by Dex, but not by BMP-2 treatment. P1NP production was decreased after Dex treatment, while BMP-2 had no effect on P1NP levels. Osteocalcin production was low in cultures not stimulated with vitamin D. Dex or BMP-2 treatment alone did not affect the basic osteocalcin levels, but in combination with vitamin D, BMP-2 increased the osteocalcin production, while Dex treatment completely suppressed osteocalcin production. Further, PTH-induced cAMP production was greatly enhanced by Dex treatment, whereas BMP-2 did not affect cAMP production. Finally, in vitro mineralization was greatly enhanced in cultures enriched with either BMP-2 or Dex. Cell proliferation was only increased significantly by Dex treatment. In conclusion, the model described produces cells with an osteoblastic phenotype, and both Dex and BMP-2 can be used as osteoblast inducers. However, the two treatments produce osteoblastic cells with different phenotypic characteristics, and a selective activation of some of the most important genes and functions of the mature osteoblast can thus be performed in vitro.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15183687     DOI: 10.1016/j.steroids.2003.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Steroids        ISSN: 0039-128X            Impact factor:   2.668


  46 in total

1.  Reciprocal induction of human dermal microvascular endothelial cells and human mesenchymal stem cells: time-dependent profile in a co-culture system.

Authors:  M S Laranjeira; M H Fernandes; F J Monteiro
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 2.  Adipose-derived stem cells in functional bone tissue engineering: lessons from bone mechanobiology.

Authors:  Josephine C Bodle; Ariel D Hanson; Elizabeth G Loboa
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 3.  Transcriptional networks controlling stromal cell differentiation.

Authors:  Alexander Rauch; Susanne Mandrup
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 4.  Dental pulp stem cells and osteogenesis: an update.

Authors:  Ibrahim Mortada; Rola Mortada
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 2.058

5.  Is Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Nucleus Pulposus Cells a Possibility for Biological Spinal Fusion?

Authors:  Sharon J Brown; Sarah A Turner; Birender S Balain; Neil T Davidson; Sally Roberts
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Vitamin D endocrine system and osteoblasts.

Authors:  Marjolein van Driel; Johannes P T M van Leeuwen
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2014-02-05

7.  Fibroblast growth factor-2 and bone morphogenetic protein-2 have a synergistic stimulatory effect on bone formation in cell cultures from elderly mouse and human bone.

Authors:  Liisa T Kuhn; Guomin Ou; Lyndon Charles; Marja M Hurley; Craig M Rodner; Gloria Gronowicz
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 8.  Physicochemical control of adult stem cell differentiation: shedding light on potential molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  Igor Titushkin; Shan Sun; Jennifer Shin; Michael Cho
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-04-01

9.  Age-related molecular genetic changes of murine bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Amber Wilson; Lina A Shehadeh; Hong Yu; Keith A Webster
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 10.  Cannabinoid receptors and the regulation of bone mass.

Authors:  I Bab; A Zimmer
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-12-10       Impact factor: 8.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.