Literature DB >> 15183405

Stabilisation of sagittal split advancement osteotomies with miniplates: a prospective, multicentre study with two-year follow-up. Part I. Clinical parameters.

W A Borstlap1, P J W Stoelinga, T J M Hoppenreijs, M A van't Hof.   

Abstract

The principal aim of this study was to assess the postoperative stability of bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (BSSO) using two miniplates. Part I reports on the clinical results including treatment characteristics, nerve functions, TMJ function, occlusional relapse and patient satisfaction. This prospective study evaluated a group of 222 patients who underwent a BSSO for mandibular advancement. The same treatment protocol was used at seven participating institutions at which the patients were treated. A stable occlusion without appreciable relapse was seen in 84% after 2 years of follow-up. A considerable minority (16%) had occlusal relapse. There were no clinical parameters that pointed towards a high risk for relapse except age. The mean operation age of the relapse group was 20.7 years (SD 6.7) and in the stable group 26.1 years (SD 8.2). The function of the inferior alveolar nerve 2 years postoperatively was reported to be normal in approximately 88% of the patients, while 94% had no complaints about nerve dysaesthesia. In approximately 56% of the patients with pre-existing TMJ-dysfunction these signs and symptoms had disappeared. Another group of patients, however, without TMJ-dysfunction preoperatively (22%) developed signs or symptoms of TMJ-dysfunction postoperatively. The sagittal split osteotomy fixed with miniplates appeared to be a relatively safe and reliable procedure giving rise to a high degree of patient satisfaction, despite the fact that some occlusal relapse was seen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15183405     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2004.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  9 in total

1.  Skeletal stability after bilateral sagittal split advancement and setback osteotomy of the mandible with miniplate fixation.

Authors:  Srinivasan Hanumantha Rao; Loganathan Selvaraj; Arathy S Lankupalli
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2013-11-20

2.  Hypoesthesia associated with mandibular movement after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Toru Yamamoto; Keiko Fujii-Abe; Haruhisa Fukayama; Hiroshi Kawahara
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-06-05

3.  Intraoperative Computed Tomography in Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy.

Authors:  Jimoh Olubanwo Agbaje; Ahmed Sobhy Salem; Ivo Lambrichts; Luc Daems; Paul Legrand; Constantinus Politis
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-12-11

4.  An in vitro comparison between two different designs of sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Valdir Cabral Andrade; Leonardo Flores Luthi; Fabio Loureiro Sato; Leandro Pozzer; Sergio Olate; Jose Ricardo Albergaria-Barbosa
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-06-23

Review 5.  The modifications of the sagittal ramus split osteotomy: a literature review.

Authors:  Roland Böckmann; Joeri Meyns; Eric Dik; Peter Kessler
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-01-08

6.  Validation of a novel imaging approach using multi-slice CT and cone-beam CT to follow-up on condylar remodeling after bimaxillary surgery.

Authors:  Laura Ferreira Pinheiro Nicolielo; Jeroen Van Dessel; Eman Shaheen; Carolina Letelier; Marina Codari; Constantinus Politis; Ivo Lambrichts; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 6.344

7.  Patient satisfaction after orthognathic surgery: a 3 year follow-up of 60 high-angle Class II individuals.

Authors:  Nina Torgersbråten; Arild Stenvik; Lisen Espeland
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Panorametry: suggestion of a method for mandibular measurements on panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  Edela Puricelli
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 9.  TMJ response to mandibular advancement surgery: an overview of risk factors.

Authors:  José Valladares-Neto; Lucia Helena Cevidanes; Wesley Cabral Rocha; Guilherme de Araújo Almeida; João Batista de Paiva; José Rino-Neto
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.