Literature DB >> 15183294

Point of care testing: improving pediatric outcomes.

Anthony F Rossi1, Danyal Khan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Goal-directed therapy (GDT) has been proven to reduce morbidly and mortality in critical illness. Point of care testing (POCT) allows rapid turn around time (TAT) of critical data, yet data suggesting improved outcomes are very limited. The impact of these two strategies on improving outcomes for patients after congenital heart surgery has never been evaluated.
DESIGN: Beginning July 2001, POCT in the form of the i-STAT handheld analyzer was incorporated in the management of patients after congenital heart surgery at our institution. Blood lactate measurements were performed serially for 24 h after surgery. Based on a lactate value, medical therapy was escalated, diminished or left unchanged after surgery. Outcome data were collected prospectively for later review. Mortality at 30 days after surgery was compared for patients undergoing a GDT protocol to a group of historical cohorts. The operative risk for all operations was determined using the RACHS-1 scoring system.
SETTING: A 16-bed Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU) in a 268-bed free-standing pediatric hospital. PATIENTS: Outcomes of infants and neonates operated on from July 2001 through July 2003 (Group B) were compared to historical controls in our institution from June 1995 through June 2001 (Group A). There were 851 patients in Group A and 378 patients in Group B. Patients in Group B were smaller and younger than those in group A (median weight 3.8 vs. 4.3 kg, P < 0.001; median age 42 vs. 76 days, P = 0.02). MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Overall mortality was lower for Group B as compared to Group A (2.4% vs. 6.2%, P < 0.007). Significant reduction in mortality between Group B and Group A was noted in neonates (4.3% vs. 12%, P = 0.008) but did not reach significance in infants (0.9% vs. 2.6%, P = NS). Patients undergoing the highest-risk operations (RACHS-1 groups 5 + 6) had a 70% reduction in mortality when comparing Group B to Group A, (9% vs. 30%, P = 0.03), but no statistical difference in mortality was noted in those patients undergoing lower-risk operations (RACHS-1 groups 1 and 2, Group B 0.5% vs. Group A 1.5%, P = NS).
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of goal-directed therapy and point of care testing significantly reduced mortality in patients undergoing congenital heart surgery. This improvement is greatest in the youngest patients and those undergoing higher-risk surgeries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15183294     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2004.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0009-9120            Impact factor:   3.281


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of different POCT devices for glucose measurement in a clinical neonatal setting.

Authors:  Matthias Roth-Kleiner; Corinne Stadelmann Diaw; Jocelyne Urfer; Christiane Ruffieux; Dominique Werner
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  The Role of Pharmacists and Pharmacy Education in Point-of-Care Testing.

Authors:  James P Kehrer; Deborah E James
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Clinical benefits of introducing real-time multiplex PCR for cerebrospinal fluid as routine diagnostic at a tertiary care pediatric center.

Authors:  Anna Eichinger; Alexandra Hagen; Melanie Meyer-Bühn; Johannes Huebner
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.553

4.  Surveillance of pediatric cardiac surgical outcome using risk stratifications at a tertiary care center in Thailand.

Authors:  Chodchanok Vijarnsorn; Duangmanee Laohaprasitiporn; Kritvikrom Durongpisitkul; Prakul Chantong; Jarupim Soongswang; Paweena Cheungsomprasong; Apichart Nana; Somchai Sriyoschati; Thawon Subtaweesin; Punnarerk Thongcharoen; Ungkab Prakanrattana; Jiraporn Krobprachya; Julaporn Pooliam
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 1.866

5.  Agreement between capillary and venous lactate in emergency department patients: prospective observational study.

Authors:  Colin A Graham; Ling Yan Leung; Ronson Sl Lo; Kwok Hung Lee; Chun Yu Yeung; Suet Yi Chan; Giles N Cattermole; Kevin Kc Hung
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  CMOS cell sensors for point-of-care diagnostics.

Authors:  Yekbun Adiguzel; Haluk Kulah
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Hematology point of care testing and laboratory errors: an example of multidisciplinary management at a children's hospital in northeast Italy.

Authors:  Sergio Parco; Patrizia Visconti; Fulvia Vascotto
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2014-01-16

8.  A reusable electrochemical proximity assay for highly selective, real-time protein quantitation in biological matrices.

Authors:  Jiaming Hu; Yajiao Yu; Jessica C Brooks; Leah A Godwin; Subramaniam Somasundaram; Ferdous Torabinejad; Joonyul Kim; Curtis Shannon; Christopher J Easley
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Care Model Design for E-Health: Integration of Point-of-Care Testing at Dutch General Practices.

Authors:  Bart Verhees; Kees van Kuijk; Lianne Simonse
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  Diagnostic Modalities in Critical Care: Point-of-Care Approach.

Authors:  Sasa Rajsic; Robert Breitkopf; Mirjam Bachler; Benedikt Treml
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.