Literature DB >> 15182925

Pair bonding and "the widow effect" in female prairie voles.

Shawn A Thomas1, Jerry O Wolff.   

Abstract

We conducted field and laboratory experiments with the well-studied monogamous prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster, to distinguish among three hypotheses for the failure of females that lose their mates to bond with a new male ("the widow effect"). The reproductive value hypothesis predicts that males prefer young to older females because they potentially have a longer reproductive lifespan. The mate rejection hypothesis predicts that females will prevent repairing by aggressively deterring males that might harm their current offspring. The misdirected paternal care hypothesis assumes that females will mate during postpartum estrus and thus will be pregnant and/or nursing young throughout the breeding season; males will avoid pairing with older females to avoid providing care to unrelated offspring and/or because of a delay to the next breeding opportunity. Males associated and bred more with older than young females, allowing us to reject the reproductive value hypothesis. Our results were consistent with the male rejection hypothesis in that females were aggressive toward unfamiliar males. Our results were most consistent with the misdirected paternal care hypothesis in that once females started breeding, they continued to become pregnant and nurse young throughout the study period. Thus, our findings suggest that the potential of misdirected paternal care and delayed mating opportunity in conjunction with the aggressive behavior of females toward unfamiliar males are likely explanations for the lack of repairing for widow females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15182925     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2004.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  9 in total

1.  Female prairie vole mate-choice is affected by the males' birth litter composition.

Authors:  J Thomas Curtis
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-04-29

2.  Rewritable fidelity: How repeated pairings and age influence subsequent pair-bond formation in male prairie voles.

Authors:  William M Kenkel; Allison M Perkeybile; Jason R Yee; C Sue Carter
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.587

3.  Amphetamine reward in the monogamous prairie vole.

Authors:  Brandon J Aragona; Jacqueline M Detwiler; Zuoxin Wang
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Does fertility trump monogamy?

Authors:  J Thomas Curtis
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  How prior pair-bonding experience affects future bonding behavior in monogamous prairie voles.

Authors:  Kelsey J Harbert; Matteo Pellegrini; Katelyn M Gordon; Zoe R Donaldson
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.587

6.  Does time after pair bond disruption affect subsequent reproduction in the socially monogamous woodland vole (Microtus pinetorum)?

Authors:  Caroline A Renfro; Daniel W Pesek; Kelly Bobeck; Nancy G Solomon
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 7.  Multi-Level Effects Driving Cognitive and Behavioral Variability among Prairie Voles: Insights into Reproductive Decision-Making from Biological Levels of Organization.

Authors:  Santiago A Forero; Alexander G Ophir
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 1.919

8.  Longitudinal Trajectories and Inter-parental Dynamics of Prairie Vole Biparental Care.

Authors:  Forrest D Rogers; Mijke Rhemtulla; Emilio Ferrer; Karen L Bales
Journal:  Front Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-06-05

9.  Dopamine regulation of social choice in a monogamous rodent species.

Authors:  Brandon J Aragona; Zuoxin Wang
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.558

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.