Literature DB >> 15182359

Expression of the pyrG gene determines the pool sizes of CTP and dCTP in Lactococcus lactis.

Casper M Jørgensen1, Karin Hammer, Peter R Jensen, Jan Martinussen.   

Abstract

The pyrG gene from Lactococcus lactis encodes CTP synthase (EC 6.4.3.2), an enzyme converting UTP to CTP. A series of strains were constructed with different levels of pyrG expression by insertion of synthetic constitutive promoters with different strengths in front of pyrG. These strains expressed pyrG levels in a range from 3 to 665% relative to the wild-type expression level. Decreasing the level of CTP synthase to 43% had no effect on the growth rate, showing that the capacity of CTP synthase in the cell is in excess in a wild-type strain. We then studied how pyrG expression affected the intracellular pool sizes of nucleotides and the correlation between pyrG expression and nucleotide pool sizes was quantified using metabolic control analysis in terms of inherent control coefficients. At the wild-type expression level, CTP synthase had full control of the CTP concentration with a concentration control coefficient close to one and a negative concentration control coefficient of -0.28 for the UTP concentration. Additionally, a concentration control coefficient of 0.49 was calculated for the dCTP concentration. Implications for the homeostasis of nucleotide pools are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15182359     DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.2004.04168.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Biochem        ISSN: 0014-2956


  8 in total

1.  Assessment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis pantothenate kinase vulnerability through target knockdown and mechanistically diverse inhibitors.

Authors:  B K Kishore Reddy; Sudhir Landge; Sudha Ravishankar; Vikas Patil; Vikas Shinde; Subramanyam Tantry; Manoj Kale; Anandkumar Raichurkar; Sreenivasaiah Menasinakai; Naina Vinay Mudugal; Anisha Ambady; Anirban Ghosh; Ragadeepthi Tunduguru; Parvinder Kaur; Ragini Singh; Naveen Kumar; Sowmya Bharath; Aishwarya Sundaram; Jyothi Bhat; Vasan K Sambandamurthy; Christofer Björkelid; T Alwyn Jones; Kaveri Das; Balachandra Bandodkar; Krishnan Malolanarasimhan; Kakoli Mukherjee; Vasanthi Ramachandran
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Tuning genetic control through promoter engineering.

Authors:  Hal Alper; Curt Fischer; Elke Nevoigt; Gregory Stephanopoulos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Transcriptome analysis of Lactococcus lactis in coculture with Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Mathieu Maligoy; Myriam Mercade; Muriel Cocaign-Bousquet; Pascal Loubiere
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  A kinetic platform for in silico modeling of the metabolic dynamics in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Aditya Barve; Anvita Gupta; Suresh M Solapure; Ansu Kumar; Vasanthi Ramachandran; Kothandaraman Seshadri; Shireen Vali; Santanu Datta
Journal:  Adv Appl Bioinform Chem       Date:  2010-12-07

5.  A rapid and reliable strategy for chromosomal integration of gene(s) with multiple copies.

Authors:  Pengfei Gu; Fan Yang; Tianyuan Su; Qian Wang; Quanfeng Liang; Qingsheng Qi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Enables a Comprehensive and Fast Analysis of Dynamics and Qualities of Stress Responses of Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei F19.

Authors:  Ann-Sophie Schott; Jürgen Behr; Jennifer Quinn; Rudi F Vogel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Prevalence of Slow-Growth Vancomycin Nonsusceptibility in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Yuki Katayama; Takuya Azechi; Motoyasu Miyazaki; Tohru Takata; Miwa Sekine; Hidehito Matsui; Hideaki Hanaki; Koji Yahara; Hiroshi Sasano; Kota Asakura; Tomoiku Takaku; Tomonori Ochiai; Norio Komatsu; Henry F Chambers
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Psychrophilic vs. Mesophilic Bacterial Species Reveals Different Strategies to Achieve Temperature Adaptation.

Authors:  Laura García-Descalzo; Eva García-López; Cristina Cid
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 5.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.