Literature DB >> 15181618

Abdominal MRI after enteroclysis or with oral contrast in patients with suspected or proven Crohn's disease.

Andreas G Schreyer1, Angela Geissler, Helga Albrich, Jürgen Schölmerich, Stefan Feuerbach, Gerhard Rogler, Markus Völk, Hans Herfarth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Diagnostic results of magnetic resonance (MR) enteroclysis correlate highly with those from conventional enteroclysis; nevertheless, intubation of the patient and positioning of an intestinal tube is still necessary for the examination, which is often remembered as the most embarrassing part of the examination by the patient. A more comfortable and highly sensitive examination of the small bowel therefore would increase patient acceptance for recurring examinations, which are often necessary, for example, in patients with Crohn's disease. This study evaluates the diagnostic efficacy of abdominal MR imaging (MRI) of the small bowel after drinking contrast agent only compared with conventional enteroclysis and abdominal MRI performed after enteroclysis in patients with suspected or proven Crohn's disease.
METHODS: Twenty-one patients with Crohn's disease referred for conventional enteroclysis underwent abdominal MRI after enteroclysis. Additionally, 1 to 3 days before or after these examinations, abdominal MRI was performed using only orally administered contrast. All MRI examinations were performed using a 1.5T scanner.
RESULTS: All pathological findings on conventional enteroclysis were shown correctly with MRI after enteroclysis and MRI after oral contrast only. Additional information by MRI was obtained in 6 of 21 patients. No statistically significant differences were found in assessing the diagnostic efficacy of the 3 examinations.
CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal MRI with oral contrast only can be used as a diagnostic tool for evaluation of the small bowel in patients with Crohn's disease and has the potential to replace conventional enteroclysis as follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15181618     DOI: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00168-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  31 in total

1.  MR enterography versus capsule endoscopy in paediatric patients with suspected Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Emanuele Casciani; Gabriele Masselli; Giovanni Di Nardo; Elisabetta Polettini; Luca Bertini; Salvatore Oliva; Irene Floriani; Salvatore Cucchiara; Gianfranco Gualdi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Wireless capsule endoscopy and Crohn's disease.

Authors:  P Swain
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Comparison of capsule endoscopy and magnetic resonance (MR) enteroclysis in suspected small bowel disease.

Authors:  Stefan K Gölder; Andreas G Schreyer; Esther Endlicher; Stefan Feuerbach; Jürgen Schölmerich; Frank Kullmann; Johannes Seitz; Gerhard Rogler; Hans Herfarth
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  New diagnostic imaging tools for inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  B A Mackalski; C N Bernstein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Comparison of MR enteroclysis with MR enterography and conventional enteroclysis in patients with Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Gabriele Masselli; Emanuele Casciani; Elisabetta Polettini; Gianfranco Gualdi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Small bowel adenocarcinoma in Crohn's disease: a case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Irmgard E Kronberger; Ivo W Graziadei; Wolfgang Vogel
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  A prospective randomized comparison between two MRI studies of the small bowel in Crohn's disease, the oral contrast method and MR enteroclysis.

Authors:  Anne Negaard; Vemund Paulsen; Leiv Sandvik; Audun Elnaes Berstad; Arne Borthne; Kirsti Try; Idar Lygren; Tryggve Storaas; Nils-Einar Klow
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Outcomes of computed tomography and magnetic resonance enterography in clinical practice of inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Niraj S Patel; Suresh Pola; Ramya Muralimohan; G Y Zou; Cynthia Santillan; Derek Patel; Barrett G Levesque; William J Sandborn
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Small bowel MRI enteroclysis or follow through: which is optimal?

Authors:  Ian C Lawrance; Christopher J Welman; Peter Shipman; Kevin Murray
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Impact of magnetic resonance in the preoperative staging and the surgical planning for treating small bowel neoplasms.

Authors:  Giuseppe Pappalardo; Gianfranco Gualdi; Aldo Nunziale; Gabriele Masselli; Irene Floriani; Emanuele Casciani
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.