Literature DB >> 15181504

Reevaluation of temporary transvenous cardiac pacemaker usage during carotid angioplasty and stenting: a safe and valuable adjunct.

Ruth L Bush1, Peter H Lin, Charles C Bianco, Julian E Hurt, Thomas I Lawhorn, Alan B Lumsden.   

Abstract

Although many current series document the safety of carotid angioplasty and stenting procedures (CAS), several acknowledge clinically significant hemodynamic disturbances in 25-71% of patients. We report herein the safety and efficacy of prophylactic percutaneous temporary transvenous cardiac pacemaker insertion during CAS for the prevention of hemodynamic changes. At a community-based institution, 48 patients undergoing 51 attempted CAS procedures from March 1999 to August 2002 for carotid artery occlusive disease were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-one percent of patients had procedures performed for either recurrent disease or a history of neck radiation; 62.5% had significant coronary disease. Temporary transvenous pacemakers were inserted as an adjunctive procedure in the authors' CAS protocol. The pacers were set to capture a heart rate decrease below 60 beats per minute. Demographics, cardiac risk, and outcomes were analyzed. CAS was successfully performed in 96% (49 lesions). In the intent-to-treat group, the patients had a mean age of 71 +/-9 years and angiographic stenoses of 88 +/-8%, with 29% having symptomatic lesions. Significant bradycardia or asystole to trigger ventricular pacing occurred in 11 (22%) procedures, thus, triggering ventricular pacing. Pharmacologic support for concomitant hypotension was temporarily necessary in only 4 (8%) cases. No patient required prolonged pacing or medication therapy following CAS. Neither presence of carotid-related symptoms nor disease etiology was related to need for intraprocedural pacing. Furthermore, there was no occurrence of pacemaker failure or other complication secondary to venous catheterization. Hemodynamic changes may occur during mechanical dilation of the carotid artery and bulb, with reports in the literature of the need for prolonged pharmacologic support. In selected patients, the prophylactic placement of a transvenous pacemaker is a safe, feasible, and expeditious method to treat periprocedural hemodynamic changes with a decrease in additional pharmacologic support during CAS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15181504     DOI: 10.1177/153857440403800306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vasc Endovascular Surg        ISSN: 1538-5744            Impact factor:   1.089


  3 in total

1.  Periprocedural monitoring with regional cerebral oxygen saturation in carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  H Kamii; K Sato; Y Matsumoto; E Furui; M Ezura; A Takahashi
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Ballooning-induced bradycardia during carotid stenting in primary stenosis and restenosis.

Authors:  Giovanni Nano; Ilias Dalainas; Paolo Bianchi; Silvia Stegher; Luciano Bet; Giovanni Malacrida; Domenico G Tealdi
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Severe hemodynamic depression after carotid artery stenting: The problem overcome with a transvenous temporary cardiac pacemaker.

Authors:  Masako Fujii; Takeshi Satow; Hiroshi Kodama; Satoshi Horiguchi
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-06-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.