Literature DB >> 15181390

Low back pain in competitive rhythmic gymnasts.

A Cupisti1, C D'Alessandro, I Evangelisti, M Piazza, F Galetta, E Morelli.   

Abstract

AIM: It has been reported that rhythmic gymnasts are at risk of suffering from low back injuries, because of repetitive lumbar hyperextensions. On the other hand, this sport requires features of leanness, muscular strength and flexibility that should represent protective factors for back pain.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the prevalence of low back pain in 67 club-level competitive rhythmic gymnasts aged 13-19 years. A standardized questionnaire was used to evaluate back-pain symptoms. Anthropometric measurements, time spent in physical activity, psychological testing results, smoking habits and age of menarche were recorded. One hundred and four age-matched general females served as control group.
RESULTS: Low back pain complaints were reported by 7 rhythmic gymnasts and by 27 controls (10.4% vs 26.0%, p<0.05); the prevalent location of back pain was bilateral in gymnasts and central in controls. Gymnasts had lower body weight, body mass index, fat body mass and delayed menarche. The females with low-back pain displayed higher body weight, body mass index, fat body mass, age, a greater smoking habit and more anxious/depressive behaviour, both in the gymnast and in the control group.
CONCLUSION: Competitive, club-level rhythmic gymnasts show a reduced prevalence of low back-pain. Being younger in age, having greater leanness, not smoking, displaying less anxious/depressive behaviour, and developing increased muscle strength and flexibility, all can represent preventive factors for low back pain. This study suggests that rhythmic gymnastics is not a discipline at increased risk of low back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15181390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness        ISSN: 0022-4707            Impact factor:   1.637


  7 in total

1.  Elite level rhythmic gymnasts have significantly more and stronger pain than peers of similar age: a prospective study.

Authors:  Manuel Sabeti; Lusine Jeremian; Alexandra Graf; Robert Kandelhart
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Low back pain status of female university students in relation to different sport activities.

Authors:  Pardis Noormohammadpour; Mohsen Rostami; Mohammad Ali Mansournia; Farzin Farahbakhsh; Mohammad Hosein Pourgharib Shahi; Ramin Kordi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  LOW BACK PAIN AND INJURY IN BALLET, MODERN, AND HIP-HOP DANCERS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.

Authors:  Erica D Henn; Tina Smith; Jatin P Ambegaonkar; Matthew Wyon
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-10

4.  Low back pain status in elite and semi-elite Australian football codes: a cross-sectional survey of football (soccer), Australian rules, rugby league, rugby union and non-athletic controls.

Authors:  Wayne Hoskins; Henry Pollard; Chris Daff; Andrew Odell; Peter Garbutt; Andrew McHardy; Kate Hardy; George Dragasevic
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Musculoskeletal Pain in Gymnasts: A Retrospective Analysis on a Cohort of Professional Athletes.

Authors:  Giacomo Farì; Francesco Fischetti; Alessandra Zonno; Francesco Marra; Alessia Maglie; Francesco Paolo Bianchi; Giuseppe Messina; Maurizio Ranieri; Marisa Megna
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Stretching the Spines of Gymnasts: A Review.

Authors:  William A Sands; Jeni R McNeal; Gabriella Penitente; Steven Ross Murray; Lawrence Nassar; Monèm Jemni; Satoshi Mizuguchi; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Sagittal Integral Morphotype of Female Classical Ballet Dancers and Predictors of Sciatica and Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Antonio Cejudo; Sebastián Gómez-Lozano; Pilar Sainz de Baranda; Alfonso Vargas-Macías; Fernando Santonja-Medina
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.