S Maldonado-Martin1, I Mujika, S Padilla. 1. Department of Research and Development, Medical Services, Athletic Club of Bilbao, Basque Country, Spain. smaldonado@wanadoo.es
Abstract
AIM: The aims of this investigation were to compare physiological characteristics between highly trained middle-distance and marathon male (n=17) and female (n=11) runners; to determine the most suitable variables to use in the gender comparison in these subjects, considering physical difference between genders; and to indicate some of the best predictors of performance in running events in which oxidative metabolism prevails. METHODS: Subjects performed a progressive maximal exercise on the treadmill to determine maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2max)) and velocities corresponding to a blood lactate concentration of 4 mmol x L(-1) (upsilon(OBLA)) and to the lactate threshold (upsilon(LT)). Cost of running (Cr) and maximal aerobic velocity (upsilon(a max)) were calculated from VO(2) measurements. RESULTS: Males presented higher VO(2max), upsilon(a max), upsilon(OBLA), upsilon(LT), and VO(2) @ upsilon(OBLA) and upsilon(LT) (p<0.001), but females had higher upsilon(OBLA) and upsilon(LT) (p<0.01) expressed as %VO(2max). upsilon(a max) correlated with performance time relative to the world record in both, females (r=-0.77, p<0.01) and males (r=-0.58, p<0.05); and upsilon(LT) with performance only in males (r=-0.59, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, female athletes seemed to compensate partly their aerobic profile with higher %VO(2max) @ u(OBLA) and u(LT), suggesting that both maximal and submaximal physiological variables should be considered when evaluating and comparing highly trained athletes of both genders. upsilon(a max) is one of the best predictors of performance in running events in which oxidative metabolism prevails.
AIM: The aims of this investigation were to compare physiological characteristics between highly trained middle-distance and marathon male (n=17) and female (n=11) runners; to determine the most suitable variables to use in the gender comparison in these subjects, considering physical difference between genders; and to indicate some of the best predictors of performance in running events in which oxidative metabolism prevails. METHODS: Subjects performed a progressive maximal exercise on the treadmill to determine maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2max)) and velocities corresponding to a blood lactate concentration of 4 mmol x L(-1) (upsilon(OBLA)) and to the lactate threshold (upsilon(LT)). Cost of running (Cr) and maximal aerobic velocity (upsilon(a max)) were calculated from VO(2) measurements. RESULTS: Males presented higher VO(2max), upsilon(a max), upsilon(OBLA), upsilon(LT), and VO(2) @ upsilon(OBLA) and upsilon(LT) (p<0.001), but females had higher upsilon(OBLA) and upsilon(LT) (p<0.01) expressed as %VO(2max). upsilon(a max) correlated with performance time relative to the world record in both, females (r=-0.77, p<0.01) and males (r=-0.58, p<0.05); and upsilon(LT) with performance only in males (r=-0.59, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, female athletes seemed to compensate partly their aerobic profile with higher %VO(2max) @ u(OBLA) and u(LT), suggesting that both maximal and submaximal physiological variables should be considered when evaluating and comparing highly trained athletes of both genders. upsilon(a max) is one of the best predictors of performance in running events in which oxidative metabolism prevails.
Authors: Eva Maria Støa; Jan Helgerud; Bent R Rønnestad; Joar Hansen; Stian Ellefsen; Øyvind Støren Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Alexandra M L Kundert; Pantelis T Nikolaidis; Stefania Di Gangi; Thomas Rosemann; Beat Knechtle Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-04-03 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sara Kind; Stefanie Brighenti-Zogg; Jonas Mundwiler; Ulla Schüpbach; Jörg D Leuppi; David Miedinger; Thomas Dieterle Journal: J Sports Med (Hindawi Publ Corp) Date: 2019-07-02
Authors: Cristóbal Sánchez Muñoz; José J Muros; Óscar López Belmonte; Mikel Zabala Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-01-20 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Beat Knechtle; Volker Scheer; Pantelis Theodoros Nikolaidis; Caio Victor Sousa Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-03-06 Impact factor: 3.390