Shu-Dong Zhang1, Timothy W Gant. 1. MRC Toxicology Unit, Hodgkin Building, Lancaster Road, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK. sdz1@le.ac.uk
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Microarray experiments generate a high data volume. However, often due to financial or experimental considerations, e.g. lack of sample, there is little or no replication of the experiments or hybridizations. These factors combined with the intrinsic variability associated with the measurement of gene expression can result in an unsatisfactory detection rate of differential gene expression (DGE). Our motivation was to provide an easy to use measure of the success rate of DGE detection that could find routine use in the design of microarray experiments or in post-experiment assessment. RESULTS: In this study, we address the problem of both random errors and systematic biases in microarray experimentation. We propose a mathematical model for the measured data in microarray experiments and on the basis of this model present a t-based statistical procedure to determine DGE. We have derived a formula to determine the success rate of DGE detection that takes into account the number of microarrays, the number of genes, the magnitude of DGE, and the variance from biological and technical sources. The formula and look-up tables based on the formula, can be used to assist in the design of microarray experiments. We also propose an ad hoc method for estimating the fraction of non-differentially expressed genes within a set of genes being tested. This will help to increase the power of DGE detection. AVAILABILITY: The functions to calculate the success rate of DGE detection have been implemented as a Java application, which is accessible at http://www.le.ac.uk/mrctox/microarray_lab/Microarray_Softwares/Microarray_Softwares.htm
MOTIVATION: Microarray experiments generate a high data volume. However, often due to financial or experimental considerations, e.g. lack of sample, there is little or no replication of the experiments or hybridizations. These factors combined with the intrinsic variability associated with the measurement of gene expression can result in an unsatisfactory detection rate of differential gene expression (DGE). Our motivation was to provide an easy to use measure of the success rate of DGE detection that could find routine use in the design of microarray experiments or in post-experiment assessment. RESULTS: In this study, we address the problem of both random errors and systematic biases in microarray experimentation. We propose a mathematical model for the measured data in microarray experiments and on the basis of this model present a t-based statistical procedure to determine DGE. We have derived a formula to determine the success rate of DGE detection that takes into account the number of microarrays, the number of genes, the magnitude of DGE, and the variance from biological and technical sources. The formula and look-up tables based on the formula, can be used to assist in the design of microarray experiments. We also propose an ad hoc method for estimating the fraction of non-differentially expressed genes within a set of genes being tested. This will help to increase the power of DGE detection. AVAILABILITY: The functions to calculate the success rate of DGE detection have been implemented as a Java application, which is accessible at http://www.le.ac.uk/mrctox/microarray_lab/Microarray_Softwares/Microarray_Softwares.htm
Authors: Reginald Davies; Arenda Schuurman; Colin R Barker; Bruce Clothier; Tatyana Chernova; Fiona M Higginson; David J Judah; David Dinsdale; Richard E Edwards; Peter Greaves; Timothy W Gant; Andrew G Smith Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Timothy W Gant; Ursula G Sauer; Shu-Dong Zhang; Brian N Chorley; Jörg Hackermüller; Stefania Perdichizzi; Knut E Tollefsen; Ben van Ravenzwaay; Carole Yauk; Weida Tong; Alan Poole Journal: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol Date: 2017-11-04 Impact factor: 3.271
Authors: Qing Wen; Paul O'Reilly; Philip D Dunne; Mark Lawler; Sandra Van Schaeybroeck; Manuel Salto-Tellez; Peter Hamilton; Shu-Dong Zhang Journal: BMC Syst Biol Date: 2015-09-01
Authors: Naissan Hussainzada; John A Lewis; Christine E Baer; Danielle L Ippolito; David A Jackson; Jonathan D Stallings Journal: BMC Pharmacol Toxicol Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 2.483
Authors: Bronwen Martin; Randall Brenneman; Kevin G Becker; Marjan Gucek; Robert N Cole; Stuart Maudsley Journal: PLoS One Date: 2008-07-23 Impact factor: 3.240