Michael J Callaghan1, Jacqueline A Oldham. 1. Centre for Rehabilitation Science, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK. michael.callaghan@man.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare a commercially available electric muscle stimulation regimen with a novel form of stimulation for the rehabilitation of the quadriceps muscle, in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. DESIGN: Double-blinded randomized trial with a parallel control group and stratified randomization. SETTING: Home-based rehabilitation program assessed in research center. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty patients (47 women, 33 men) with patellofemoral pain syndrome. INTERVENTIONS: One group (EMPI) received 1 uniform constant frequency component of 35Hz. The other (EXPER) group received an experimental form of stimulation that contained 5 simultaneously delivered frequency components of 125, 83, 50, 2.5, and 2Hz. Stimulation was applied to the quadriceps muscles of the affected leg for 1 hour daily for 6 weeks, a total of 42 treatments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Lower-limb isometric and isokinetic torque, quadriceps fatigue, knee flexion, patellar pain, a step test, quadriceps cross-sectional area, and Kujala patellofemoral score for pain before and after treatment. RESULTS:Seventy-four patients (43 women, 31 men) completed the trial. Patients in both groups showed significant improvements in all outcomes (P<.05). No significant differences existed between the 2 stimulators in any outcome (P>.05) except for quadriceps cross-sectional area (P=.023). CONCLUSIONS: One form of stimulation was just as efficacious as the other in improving subjective and objective measures.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare a commercially available electric muscle stimulation regimen with a novel form of stimulation for the rehabilitation of the quadriceps muscle, in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. DESIGN: Double-blinded randomized trial with a parallel control group and stratified randomization. SETTING: Home-based rehabilitation program assessed in research center. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty patients (47 women, 33 men) with patellofemoral pain syndrome. INTERVENTIONS: One group (EMPI) received 1 uniform constant frequency component of 35Hz. The other (EXPER) group received an experimental form of stimulation that contained 5 simultaneously delivered frequency components of 125, 83, 50, 2.5, and 2Hz. Stimulation was applied to the quadriceps muscles of the affected leg for 1 hour daily for 6 weeks, a total of 42 treatments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Lower-limb isometric and isokinetic torque, quadriceps fatigue, knee flexion, patellar pain, a step test, quadriceps cross-sectional area, and Kujala patellofemoral score for pain before and after treatment. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients (43 women, 31 men) completed the trial. Patients in both groups showed significant improvements in all outcomes (P<.05). No significant differences existed between the 2 stimulators in any outcome (P>.05) except for quadriceps cross-sectional area (P=.023). CONCLUSIONS: One form of stimulation was just as efficacious as the other in improving subjective and objective measures.
Authors: Ethne L Nussbaum; Pamela Houghton; Joseph Anthony; Sandy Rennie; Barbara L Shay; Alison M Hoens Journal: Physiother Can Date: 2017 Impact factor: 1.037
Authors: Ana Luiza C Martimbianco; Maria Regina Torloni; Brenda Ng Andriolo; Gustavo Jm Porfírio; Rachel Riera Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-12-12
Authors: Lori A Bolgla; Michelle C Boling; Kimberly L Mace; Michael J DiStefano; Donald C Fithian; Christopher M Powers Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 2.860