OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of combined botulinum toxin type A (BTX) and functional electric stimulation (FES) treatment on spastic drop foot in stroke. DESIGN: Nonblinded randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive sample of 21 ambulant adults within 1 year after stroke with a spastic drop foot, of whom 18 completed the study. INTERVENTIONS: The treatment group received BTX injections (Dysport) on 1 occasion into the medial and lateral heads of the gastrocnemius (200U each) and tibialis posterior (400U each) muscles and FES, used on a daily basis for 16 weeks to assist walking. Both groups continued with physiotherapy at the same rate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Walking speed, Physiological Cost Index, Modified Ashworth Scale, Rivermead Motor Assessment, and Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. RESULTS:Walking speed increased over 12 weeks in both control (P=.020) and treatment groups (nonstimulated, P=.004; stimulated, P=.042). The baseline corrected (analysis of covariance) increase in mean walking speed at 12 weeks, relative to controls, was.04m/s (95% confidence interval [CI],.003-.090) without stimulation, and.09m/s (95% CI,.031-.150) with stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: Combined treatment effectively improved walking and function. A larger study is needed to quantify the treatment effect and to investigate its impact on quality of life.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of combined botulinum toxin type A (BTX) and functional electric stimulation (FES) treatment on spastic drop foot in stroke. DESIGN: Nonblinded randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive sample of 21 ambulant adults within 1 year after stroke with a spastic drop foot, of whom 18 completed the study. INTERVENTIONS: The treatment group received BTX injections (Dysport) on 1 occasion into the medial and lateral heads of the gastrocnemius (200U each) and tibialis posterior (400U each) muscles and FES, used on a daily basis for 16 weeks to assist walking. Both groups continued with physiotherapy at the same rate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Walking speed, Physiological Cost Index, Modified Ashworth Scale, Rivermead Motor Assessment, and Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. RESULTS: Walking speed increased over 12 weeks in both control (P=.020) and treatment groups (nonstimulated, P=.004; stimulated, P=.042). The baseline corrected (analysis of covariance) increase in mean walking speed at 12 weeks, relative to controls, was.04m/s (95% confidence interval [CI],.003-.090) without stimulation, and.09m/s (95% CI,.031-.150) with stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: Combined treatment effectively improved walking and function. A larger study is needed to quantify the treatment effect and to investigate its impact on quality of life.
Authors: J Wissel; M auf dem Brinke; M Hecht; C Herrmann; M Huber; S Mehnert; I Reuter; A Schramm; A Stenner; C van der Ven; M Winterholler; A Kupsch Journal: Nervenarzt Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 1.214
Authors: Anne Elisabeth Carolus; Michael Becker; Jeanne Cuny; Rüdiger Smektala; Kirsten Schmieder; Christopher Brenke Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2019-05-17 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Anupam Datta Gupta; Wing Hong Chu; Stuart Howell; Subhojit Chakraborty; Simon Koblar; Renuka Visvanathan; Ian Cameron; David Wilson Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2018-01-05