Literature DB >> 15179398

Enamel loss associated with orthodontic adhesive removal on teeth with white spot lesions: an in vitro study.

Eser Tüfekçi1, Thomas E Merrill, Maria R Pintado, John P Beyer, William A Brantley.   

Abstract

Teeth with white spot lesions (WSL) might be more prone to enamel loss during bracket debonding. This in vitro study compared enamel loss from teeth with (n = 14) and without (n = 14) WSL after polishing with low-speed finishing burs or disks (Sof-Lex, 3M ESPE, St Paul, Minn). Debonded surfaces were analyzed with a contact stylus profilometer, and digitized data were compared with baseline readings by using AnSur NT software (Regents, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn). Specimen surfaces were also examined with a scanning electron microscope. Two-way analysis of variance was performed to analyze the data. In teeth without WSL, the volume losses were 0.16 mm(3) for the bur group and 0.10 mm(3) for the disk group; the mean maximum depths were 47.7 microm for the bur group and 54.3 microm for the disk group. In teeth with WSL, the volume losses were 0.06 and 0.17 mm(3), and the mean maximum depths were 35.1 and 48.7 microm for the bur and disk groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in enamel loss between the 2 groups of teeth without WSL (P =.12). However, in teeth with WSL, the burs removed less enamel than the disks (P = 0.006). Scanning electron microscope examination showed that any damage on the enamel surface was usually located in the cervical third of the teeth. On most specimens, even though tooth surfaces appeared resin-free to the naked eye, there were remnants of it. The differences between groups were so small that they might be clinically insignificant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15179398     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  6 in total

1.  Post-gel shrinkage, elastic modulus, and stress generated by orthodontic adhesives.

Authors:  Michael J Rasmussen; Cameron Togrye; Terry M Trojan; Daranee Tantbirojn; Antheunis Versluis
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Analysis of enamel surface damage after selective laser ablation of composite from tooth surfaces.

Authors:  Kenneth H Chan; Krista Hirasuna; Daniel Fried
Journal:  Photonics Lasers Med       Date:  2014-02-01

3.  Enamel surface evaluation after bracket debonding and different resin removal methods.

Authors:  Michele Machado Vidor; Rafael Perdomo Felix; Ernani Menezes Marchioro; Luciane Hahn
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

Review 4.  Effect of orthodontic debonding and adhesive removal on the enamel - current knowledge and future perspectives - a systematic review.

Authors:  Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska; Tomasz Szatkiewicz; Robert Tomkowski; Katarzyna Tandecka; Katarzyna Grocholewicz
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-10-20

5.  Effects of various debonding and adhesive clearance methods on enamel surface: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Xiao-Chuan Fan; Li Chen; Xiao-Feng Huang
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  Three-dimensional analysis of enamel surface alteration resulting from orthodontic clean-up -comparison of three different tools.

Authors:  Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska; Katarzyna Tandecka; Tomasz Szatkiewicz; Piotr Stępień; Katarzyna Sporniak-Tutak; Katarzyna Grocholewicz
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.757

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.