BACKGROUND: Ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) injury is a major determinant of early graft dysfunction and long-term graft survival in small intestinal transplantation. The cavitary two-layer method (TLM) has been reported to be superior to the University of Wisconsin cold storage method (UWM) in long-term preservation of canine small intestine. This study was designed to evaluate the protective effect of the cavitary TLM against I/R injury in canine small intestinal transplantation. METHODS: Intestinal grafts harvested from beagles were allotransplanted after 24-hour preservation by UWM (group 1) or the cavitary TLM (group 2). The graft in the controls (group 3) was immediately allotransplanted without preservation. I/R injury was assessed by functional success rates, biochemical assay, graft adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and lipid peroxidation (LPO) concentrations, and histopathologic examination including TUNEL staining for apoptosis. RESULTS: In group 1, ATP recovery was delayed after reperfusion, and most recipients died with hemorrhage of the grafts and lungs. In group 2, graft ATP concentrations recovered rapidly, and I/R injury was prevented with reduced LPO production, resulting in good outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The cavitary TLM protected intestinal grafts against I/R injury evidenced by maintenance of graft ATP levels and reduction of LPO production compared with UWM in canine small intestinal transplantation.
BACKGROUND:Ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) injury is a major determinant of early graft dysfunction and long-term graft survival in small intestinal transplantation. The cavitary two-layer method (TLM) has been reported to be superior to the University of Wisconsin cold storage method (UWM) in long-term preservation of canine small intestine. This study was designed to evaluate the protective effect of the cavitary TLM against I/R injury in canine small intestinal transplantation. METHODS: Intestinal grafts harvested from beagles were allotransplanted after 24-hour preservation by UWM (group 1) or the cavitary TLM (group 2). The graft in the controls (group 3) was immediately allotransplanted without preservation. I/R injury was assessed by functional success rates, biochemical assay, graft adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and lipid peroxidation (LPO) concentrations, and histopathologic examination including TUNEL staining for apoptosis. RESULTS: In group 1, ATP recovery was delayed after reperfusion, and most recipients died with hemorrhage of the grafts and lungs. In group 2, graft ATP concentrations recovered rapidly, and I/R injury was prevented with reduced LPO production, resulting in good outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The cavitary TLM protected intestinal grafts against I/R injury evidenced by maintenance of graft ATP levels and reduction of LPO production compared with UWM in canine small intestinal transplantation.