BACKGROUND: This retrospective review tests the hypothesis that including selective splenic arteriography and embolization in the algorithm of a previously existing nonoperative management (NOM) strategy will result in higher rates of successful NOM in patients with blunt splenic injury. METHODS: All patients with blunt splenic injuries documented by computed tomographic scan and/or operative findings over a 24-month period at a Level I trauma center were reviewed. A previously published series from this institution of 251 patients with splenic injury (Group 1) was then compared with the patients that constitute this current review (Group 2). Group 2 was then compared with patients described in a previous publication advocating nonselective arteriography in blunt splenic injuries. RESULTS: Thirteen patients with blunt splenic injury in Group 2 underwent 14 splenic embolization procedures, with 12 (93%) being successfully treated without operation. Group 2 had a significantly higher NOM rate (82% vs. 65%, p < 0.01) than Group 1. These results are similar to the series published by Sclafani et al. (82.1% vs. 83.1%) in which every patient with splenic injury that was managed non-operatively underwent arteriography with or without embolization. CONCLUSION: A high rate of NOM can be achieved with observation and selective use of arteriography with or without embolization in the management of blunt splenic injuries.
BACKGROUND: This retrospective review tests the hypothesis that including selective splenic arteriography and embolization in the algorithm of a previously existing nonoperative management (NOM) strategy will result in higher rates of successful NOM in patients with blunt splenic injury. METHODS: All patients with blunt splenic injuries documented by computed tomographic scan and/or operative findings over a 24-month period at a Level I trauma center were reviewed. A previously published series from this institution of 251 patients with splenic injury (Group 1) was then compared with the patients that constitute this current review (Group 2). Group 2 was then compared with patients described in a previous publication advocating nonselective arteriography in blunt splenic injuries. RESULTS: Thirteen patients with blunt splenic injury in Group 2 underwent 14 splenic embolization procedures, with 12 (93%) being successfully treated without operation. Group 2 had a significantly higher NOM rate (82% vs. 65%, p < 0.01) than Group 1. These results are similar to the series published by Sclafani et al. (82.1% vs. 83.1%) in which every patient with splenic injury that was managed non-operatively underwent arteriography with or without embolization. CONCLUSION: A high rate of NOM can be achieved with observation and selective use of arteriography with or without embolization in the management of blunt splenic injuries.
Authors: B Wernick; A Cipriano; S R Odom; U MacBean; R N Mubang; T R Wojda; S Liu; S Serres; D C Evans; P G Thomas; C H Cook; S P Stawicki Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2016-05-11 Impact factor: 3.693
Authors: Matthew Oliver; Michael M Dinh; Kate Curtis; Royce Paschkewitz; Oran Rigby; Zsolt J Balogh Journal: World J Surg Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Andrew Smith; Jean-Francois Ouellet; Daniel Niven; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Elijah Dixon; Scott D'Amours; Chad G Ball Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.089