Literature DB >> 15179114

Optimizing dynamic range in children using the nucleus cochlear implant.

P W Dawson1, J A Decker, C E Psarros.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the benefits of the preprocessing scheme "Adaptive Dynamic Range Optimization" (ADRO) in children using Nucleus cochlear implants. Previous research with adults indicates improved speech perception in quiet and improved sound quality in everyday listening environments with the ADRO scheme.
DESIGN: Children were given 4 wk of take-home experience with ADRO, with a minimum of 2 wk in which ADRO was "locked-in." After 1 wk of ADRO use and again after 4 wk of ADRO use, Bench-Kowal-Bamford (BKB) sentence perception in quiet at a low input level of 50 dB SPL (unweighted root mean square) and sentence perception in noise were compared with the child's everyday (Standard) program and the ADRO program. Children also rated the loudness of a variety of environmental sounds and indicated which program provided the best hearing in a variety of everyday listening situations.
RESULTS: On average, BKB sentence perception in quiet at 50 dB SPL was significantly better with the ADRO program compared with the Standard program. The group mean improvement was 8.60%. Similarly, group mean scores for BKB sentences presented at 65 dB SPL in multitalker babble were significantly higher with the ADRO program (an improvement of 6.87%). The ADRO program was the preferred program in 46% of the listening situations, whereas the Standard program was preferred in 26% of situations. Everyday sounds were not unacceptably loud with ADRO.
CONCLUSIONS: There was an ADRO benefit for this group of children in quiet and in noise. These findings suggest that young children would benefit from the ADRO programming option being locked in along with other processor settings in the SPrint processor once their MAP levels have stabilized. Some older children and teenagers may choose to use ADRO selectively for specific listening situations. Copyright 2004 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15179114     DOI: 10.1097/01.aud.0000130795.66185.28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  19 in total

1.  Factors contributing to speech perception scores in long-term pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Ann E Geers; Peter J Blamey; Emily A Tobey; Christine A Brenner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 2.  Adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO): a digital amplification strategy for hearing aids and cochlear implants.

Authors:  Peter J Blamey
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

Review 3.  The development of the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear implant system.

Authors:  James F Patrick; Peter A Busby; Peter J Gibson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-12

4.  Effects of source-to-listener distance and masking on perception of cochlear implant processed speech in reverberant rooms.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Whitmal; Sarah F Poissant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Lisa S Davidson; Rosalie M Uchanski; Johanna G Nicholas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  The Effects of Preprocessing Strategies for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Bernadette Rakszawski; Rose Wright; Jamie H Cadieux; Lisa S Davidson; Christine Brenner
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Benefits from upgrade to the CP810 sound processor for Nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Isabelle Mosnier; Mathieu Marx; Frederic Venail; Natalie Loundon; Samantha Roux-Vaillard; Olivier Sterkers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Evaluation of adaptive dynamic range optimization in adverse listening conditions for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Hussnain Ali; Oldooz Hazrati; Emily A Tobey; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Availability of binaural cues for bilateral implant recipients and bimodal listeners with and without preserved hearing in the implanted ear.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Sterling W Sheffield; Kate Teece; Amy P Olund
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 1.854

10.  Comparison of Intensity Discrimination between Children Using Cochlear Implants and Typically Developing Children.

Authors:  Shubha Tak; Asha Yathiraj
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.017

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.