Literature DB >> 15177808

Length effect in reading and lexical decision: evidence from skilled readers and a developmental dyslexic participant.

Alexandra Juphard1, Serge Carbonnel, Sylviane Valdois.   

Abstract

A number of experimental data have shown that naming latency increases with length for pseudo-words but not for frequent real words. Different interpretations have been proposed by current models of reading to account for such a length effect. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of lexicality on length effect in both the reading and lexical decision tasks. For this purpose, skilled readers were asked to either name or make a lexical decision on words and pseudo-words differing in length from one to three syllables. Skilled readers' results show that length effect is modulated by lexicality in the reading task but no length effect was found in the lexical decision task. The tasks were further proposed to a well-compensated dyslexic participant who exhibited a visual attentional disorder in the absence of any associated phonological problems. A length effect on RTs was found for both words and pseudo-words in lexical decision but naming latencies were affected by length for the pseudo-words only. The present results largely conform to the predictions of the ACV98 model of reading. They are not compatible with the PDP models of reading and can only be partially accounted for by dual route models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15177808     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  11 in total

1.  Word learning and the cerebral hemispheres: from serial to parallel processing of written words.

Authors:  Andrew W Ellis; Roberto Ferreira; Polly Cathles-Hagan; Kathryn Holt; Lisa Jarvis; Laura Barca
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  A dual-route perspective on brain activation in response to visual words: evidence for a length by lexicality interaction in the visual word form area (VWFA).

Authors:  Matthias Schurz; Denise Sturm; Fabio Richlan; Martin Kronbichler; Gunther Ladurner; Heinz Wimmer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Direct evidence for two different neural mechanisms for reading familiar and unfamiliar words: an intra-cerebral EEG study.

Authors:  Alexandra Juphard; Juan R Vidal; Marcela Perrone-Bertolotti; Lorella Minotti; Philippe Kahane; Jean-Philippe Lachaux; Monica Baciu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Acquisition of Chinese characters: the effects of character properties and individual differences among second language learners.

Authors:  Li-Jen Kuo; Tae-Jin Kim; Xinyuan Yang; Huiwen Li; Yan Liu; Haixia Wang; Jeong Hyun Park; Ying Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-03

5.  When the Eyes No Longer Lead: Familiarity and Length Effects on Eye-Voice Span.

Authors:  Susana Silva; Alexandra Reis; Luís Casaca; Karl M Petersson; Luís Faísca
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-02

6.  The Influence of Orthographic Units Across Korean Children of Different Ages in Hangul Reading.

Authors:  Yeongsil Ju; Ami Sambai; Akira Uno
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-01

7.  Phonological and orthographic processing in basic literacy adults and dyslexic children.

Authors:  Régine Kolinsky; Méghane Tossonian
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2022-09-15

8.  Visual word learning in adults with dyslexia.

Authors:  Rosa K W Kwok; Andrew W Ellis
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Lexical Reading in Dysfluent Readers of German.

Authors:  Melanie Gangl; Kristina Moll; Manon W Jones; Chiara Banfi; Gerd Schulte-Körne; Karin Landerl
Journal:  Sci Stud Read       Date:  2017-07-25

10.  Words in Context: The Effects of Length, Frequency, and Predictability on Brain Responses During Natural Reading.

Authors:  Sarah Schuster; Stefan Hawelka; Florian Hutzler; Martin Kronbichler; Fabio Richlan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.