Literature DB >> 15177806

Multisensory executive functioning.

Amelia R Hunt1, Alan Kingstone.   

Abstract

To better understand the prefrontal circuitry that putatively supports executive functions, such as those involved in switching tasks, we asked whether a current task set is open equally to receiving information from any sensory modality or if it is to some degree modality-specific. Subjects were presented with a sequence of digits to be classified as either odd/even or greater/less than five. The digits were either auditory or visual, with the modality varying randomly. Results demonstrated a reaction time (RT) cost associated with switching between tasks and also an unexpected cost of switching between modalities. When both modality and task switched, the two costs were greater than either of the costs alone, but significantly less than predicted simply by summing the two costs together (i.e., they were underadditive). These data indicate that the frontal mechanisms that allow for a switch in task are only partially modality-specific. Current theories of executive function must be adapted to account for this finding. We also suggest that the present paradigm is amenable to future research aimed at determining precisely how modalities are linked within a task set.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15177806     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  12 in total

1.  Alternating between pro- and antisaccades: switch-costs manifest via decoupling the spatial relations between stimulus and response.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Caitlin Gillen; Ashna Samani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Are there control processes, and (if so) can they be studied?

Authors:  Glenn R Wylie; James F Sumowski; Micah Murray
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-06-29

3.  Emerging features of modality mappings in task switching: modality compatibility requires variability at the level of both stimulus and response modality.

Authors:  Edina Fintor; Denise N Stephan; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-06-03

4.  Visual perceptual load induces inattentional deafness.

Authors:  James S P Macdonald; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Is Attentional Resource Allocation Across Sensory Modalities Task-Dependent?

Authors:  Basil Wahn; Peter König
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-03-31

6.  Neural activity patterns between different executive tasks are more similar in adulthood than in adolescence.

Authors:  Mona Moisala; Viljami Salmela; Synnove Carlson; Katariina Salmela-Aro; Kirsti Lonka; Kai Hakkarainen; Kimmo Alho
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 2.708

7.  Information processes of task-switching and modality-shifting across development.

Authors:  Anna Peng; Natasha Z Kirkham; Denis Mareschal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The SwAD-Task - An Innovative Paradigm for Measuring Costs of Switching Between Different Attentional Demands.

Authors:  Magnus Liebherr; Stephanie Antons; Matthias Brand
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-04

9.  Semantic Congruency Modulates the Effect of Attentional Load on the Audiovisual Integration of Animate Images and Sounds.

Authors:  Qingqing Li; Qiong Wu; Yiyang Yu; Fengxia Wu; Satoshi Takahashi; Yoshimichi Ejima; Jiajia Yang; Jinglong Wu
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2020-12-31

10.  Confidence as a Common Currency between Vision and Audition.

Authors:  Vincent de Gardelle; François Le Corre; Pascal Mamassian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.