Literature DB >> 15177740

Planning for protective action decision making: evacuate or shelter-in-place.

John H Sorensen1, Barry L Shumpert, Barbara M Vogt.   

Abstract

Protecting the public from an airborne hazardous chemical release requires that appropriate protective actions be selected quickly. When deciding whether to recommend evacuation or shelter-in-place, decision makers must weigh the interaction of numerous factors that characterize the release, the meteorological conditions, and the populations that may be affected. This article examines the components of the protective action decision process and describes steps that should be taken in a planning context to prepare for efficient decision making during an emergency. Methods of organizing information to facilitate decision making are identified, and a model useful for detailed analysis of specific emergency scenarios is described.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15177740     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hazard Mater        ISSN: 0304-3894            Impact factor:   10.588


  8 in total

1.  Exposures and symptoms among workers after an offsite train derailment and vinyl chloride release.

Authors:  Jason A Wilken; Leah Graziano; Elena Vaouli; Karl Markiewicz; Robert Helverson; Kimberly Brinker; Alice M Shumate; Mary Anne Duncan
Journal:  Am J Disaster Med       Date:  2015

2.  Emergency control system based on the analytical hierarchy process and coordinated development degree model for sudden water pollution accidents in the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Transfer Project in China.

Authors:  Yan Long; Guobin Xu; Chao Ma; Liang Chen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Multi-dimensional dynamic fuzzy monitoring model for the effect of water pollution treatment.

Authors:  Huimin Li; Yongchao Cao; Limin Su
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Mechanistic modeling of emergency events: assessing the impact of hypothetical releases of anthrax.

Authors:  S S Isukapalli; P J Lioy; P G Georgopoulos
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  Emergency Evacuation Plan for Hazardous Chemicals Leakage Accidents Using GIS-based Risk Analysis Techniques in South Korea.

Authors:  Byungtae Yoo; Sang D Choi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Impacts of COVID-19 related stay-at-home restrictions on residential electricity use and implications for future grid stability.

Authors:  Lechen Li; Christoph J Meinrenken; Vijay Modi; Patricia J Culligan
Journal:  Energy Build       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 5.879

7.  Protective Behaviour of Citizens to Transport Accidents Involving Hazardous Materials: A Discrete Choice Experiment Applied to Populated Areas nearby Waterways.

Authors:  Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Arnold D Bergstra; Michiel C J Bliemer; Inge J M Trijssenaar-Buhre; Alex Burdorf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Rapid identification of multiple constantly-released contaminant sources in indoor environments with unknown release time.

Authors:  Hao Cai; Xianting Li; Zhilong Chen; Mingyang Wang
Journal:  Build Environ       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 6.456

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.