Literature DB >> 15177238

Risk factors for complications after carotid endarterectomy--a population-based study.

B Kragsterman1, K Logason, A Ahari, T Troëng, H Parsson, D Bergqvist.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The overall benefit of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is dependent on the outcome from the procedure. However, many reports are from selected centres and not population-based. The aim of this study was to assess the 30-day complication rate for a whole country and also to determine independent risk factors for serious complications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One thousand five hundred and eighteen CEA were retrospectively reviewed, covering principally all the CEAs in Sweden, during a three year period. Indications for surgery were; minor stroke 34%, TIA 34%, amaurosis fugax 18%, asymptomatic 11% and others 3%. Data were collected from the Swedish Vascular Registry (Swedvasc). Combined cohort and case-control methodology was used.
RESULTS: Registered complications were; 43 permanent strokes, 32 transient strokes (<30 days), 18 TIA/amaurosis fugax and 22 deaths (seven fatal stokes). In the cohort study, the 30-day permanent stroke and death rate were 4.3% (65/1518). Significant risk factors in multivariate analyses were the indication for surgery (minor stroke vs. other indications) (p=0.02, RR=1.38), diabetes (p=0.02, RR=1.41), cardiac disease (p<0.01, RR 1.43) and operation at a university hospital (p=0.02, RR=1.39). In the case-control study comparing the 65 cases of permanent stroke and/or death with 130 matched controls the only significant risk factor was contralateral occlusion (p<0.01, OR=5.27). One patient (1/130) with a permanent stroke was wrongly reported as a local neurological complication (facial paresis).
CONCLUSION: This national audit demonstrated population-based data on complication rates after CEA well comparable with previous randomised trials. The validity of the Swedvasc data was confirmed. Combined cohort and case-control methodology was useful in analysing risk factors for serious perioperative complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15177238     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  5 in total

1.  Predictors of neurocognitive decline after carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  J Mocco; David A Wilson; Ricardo J Komotar; Joseph Zurica; William J Mack; Hadi J Halazun; Raheleh Hatami; Robert R Sciacca; E Sander Connolly; Eric J Heyer
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  A risk factor-based predictive model of outcomes in carotid endarterectomy: the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2005-2010.

Authors:  Kimon Bekelis; Samuel F Bakhoum; Atman Desai; Todd A Mackenzie; Philip Goodney; Nicos Labropoulos
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Risk factors for perioperative death and stroke after carotid endarterectomy: results of the new york carotid artery surgery study.

Authors:  Ethan A Halm; Stanley Tuhrim; Jason J Wang; Caron Rockman; Thomas S Riles; Mark R Chassin
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Impact of Surgeon Experience During Carotid Endarterectomy Operation and Effects on Perioperative Outcomes.

Authors:  Volkan Yüksel; Ahmet Coskun Ozdemir; Serhat Huseyin; Orkut Guclu; Fatma Nesrin Turan; Suat Canbaz
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

5.  The SAPPHIRE criteria, history of myocardial infarction and diabetes predict adverse outcomes following carotid endarterectomy similar to stenting.

Authors:  Roland Richard Macharzina; Carolin Müller; Matthias Vogt; Steven R Messé; Werner Vach; Thomas Winker; Michael Weinbeck; Matthias Siepe; Martin Czerny; Franz-Josef Neumann; Thomas Zeller
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 5.460

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.