Literature DB >> 1517722

The information needs of family physicians: case-specific clinical questions.

J W Ely1, R J Burch, D C Vinson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physicians must be able to rapidly obtain information that answers specific patient-related clinical questions. This study describes the information-seeking process in the office practices of family physicians.
METHODS: We observed and recorded the information-seeking and information-obtaining behavior of 30 family physicians in their offices.
RESULTS: Based on 172 hours of observation and 602 patient visits, family physicians sought answers to an average of only one clinical question for every 15 patients seen. Urban physicians sought answers to more questions than rural physicians (one question for every 9 patients, as compared with one question for every 24 patients; P less than .05). The frequency of seeking information was not related to the physician's age. Busier physicians (those seeing more patients per hour) tended to ask fewer questions (correlation coefficient (r) = -.34, P = .06). Drug-prescribing questions were the most common type; second most common were orthopedic questions. Colleagues and the Physicians' Desk Reference were the most often used resources. Eight percent of the questions were not answered.
CONCLUSIONS: Among family physicians, patient-related questions are infrequently asked and highly specific. Most questions are rapidly answered using colleagues and books, not journals or computers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1517722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  50 in total

1.  Medcast: evaluation of an intelligent pull technology to support the information needs of physicians.

Authors:  J G Anderson; L L Casebeer; R E Kristofco
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

2.  Solutions to challenges facing a university digital library and press.

Authors:  M P D'Alessandro; J R Galvin; S I Colbert; D M D'Alessandro; T A Choi; B D Aker; W S Carlson; G D Pelzer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Use of MEDLINE by rural physicians in Washington state.

Authors:  S J Chimoskey; T E Norris
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  The evolving role of the librarian in evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  C S Scherrer; J L Dorsch
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1999-07

5.  Electronic information access in support of clinical decision making: a comparative study of the impact on rural health care outcomes.

Authors:  J J McGowan; M Richwine
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

6.  Creating a pediatric digital library for pediatric health care providers and families: using literature and data to define common pediatric problems.

Authors:  Donna D'Alessandro; Peggy Kingsley
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 7.  An industrial process view of information delivery to support clinical decision making: implications for systems design and process measures.

Authors:  R B Elson; J G Faughnan; D P Connelly
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Journal-citation-seeking behavior at two health sciences libraries.

Authors:  Sunny Lynn Worel
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2004-01

9.  Bridging the gap between therapeutic research results and physician prescribing decisions: knowledge transfer, a prerequisite to knowledge translation.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Boissel; Emmanuel Amsallem; Michel Cucherat; Patrice Nony; Margaret C Haugh
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  A study of clinical questions posed by hospital clinicians.

Authors:  Grace Y T Cheng
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2004-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.