Literature DB >> 15177051

Role of immune responsiveness and DNA repair capacity genes in ageing.

Gino Doria1, Paola Barattini, Salvatore Scarpaci, Anne Puel, Luisa Guidi, Daniela Frasca.   

Abstract

The genetic factors that determine immune responsiveness and DNA repair capacity are reviewed as major elements influencing the life span. Within this framework two sets of new data obtained in mice and humans are reported and discussed. As to the first set, the role of immune response genes was investigated in Biozzi mice genetically selected for high (H) or low (L) antibody response. After 15-20 generations of assortative mating, H and L mice exhibited almost complete intraline homozygosity and interline polymorphism including distinct H-2 haplotypes, such as q in H and s in L mice. In order to analyze the impact of quantitative trait loci (QTL) on the antibody response as well as on the DNA repair capacity in cells of the immune system independently of the selected H-2 haplotype, congenic Hq and Hs as well as Lq and Ls mice were produced and analysed. Both the antibody response and DNA repair capacity were found to be independent of the H-2 haplotype and determined by QTL. As to the second set of data, DNA repair was also studied in irradiated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from ageing humans. The levels of ku 70, ku 80, DNA-PKcs, phosphorylated ku 80 as well as the DNA-binding activity of the ku70/ku 80 heterodimer were determined in the cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts obtained, before and after irradiation, from young and elderly subjects. The results of this study suggest that the decreased DNA repair capacity in PBMC from elderly subjects may be related to impaired migration of the phosphorylated ku 80 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. This finding helps to elucidate questions related to the impairment of DNA repair during ageing. Copyright 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15177051     DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2003.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ageing Res Rev        ISSN: 1568-1637            Impact factor:   10.895


  8 in total

Review 1.  DNA double-strand breaks: a potential causative factor for mammalian aging?

Authors:  Han Li; James R Mitchell; Paul Hasty
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 5.432

Review 2.  Cellular stress response pathways and ageing: intricate molecular relationships.

Authors:  Nikos Kourtis; Nektarios Tavernarakis
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Methylation of the nonhomologous end joining repair pathway genes does not explain the increase of translocations with aging.

Authors:  Idoia Martín-Guerrero; Elena de Prado; Elixabet Lopez-Lopez; Maite Ardanaz; Juan Carlos Vitoria; Luis A Parada; Cristina García-Orad; Africa García-Orad
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2014-11-16

4.  Genomic response to selection for postponed senescence in Drosophila.

Authors:  Rhonda H Wilson; Chao Qiang Lai; Richard F Lyman; Trudy F C Mackay
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 5.432

Review 5.  Changes in DNA repair during aging.

Authors:  Vera Gorbunova; Andrei Seluanov; Zhiyong Mao; Christpher Hine
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  The Genomic Basis of Postponed Senescence in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Megan Ulmer Carnes; Terry Campbell; Wen Huang; Daniel G Butler; Mary Anna Carbone; Laura H Duncan; Sasha V Harbajan; Edward M King; Kara R Peterson; Alexander Weitzel; Shanshan Zhou; Trudy F C Mackay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Rec-8 dimorphism affects longevity, stress resistance and X-chromosome nondisjunction in C. elegans, and replicative lifespan in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Srinivas Ayyadevara; Cagdas Tazearslan; Ramani Alla; James C Jiang; S Michal Jazwinski; Robert J Shmookler Reis
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Genetic Basis of Increased Lifespan and Postponed Senescence in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Grace A Parker; Nathan Kohn; Ally Spirina; Anna McMillen; Wen Huang; Trudy F C Mackay
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.154

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.